Quality of Life Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at a Referral Hospital in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Asep Kuswandi (1), Dini Mariani (2), Yanti Cahyati (3), Dewi Aryanti (4), Dita Eka Mardiani (5), Rani Rubiyanti (6), Lina Khasanah (7), Diana Barsasella (8)
(1) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(2) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(3) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(4) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(5) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(6)
(7) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
(8) Poltekkes Kemenkes Tasikmalaya, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite :
Kuswandi, A., Mariani, D., Cahyati, Y., Aryanti, D., Mardiani, D. E., Rubiyanti, R., … Diana Barsasella. (2026). Quality of Life Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at a Referral Hospital in Tasikmalaya, Indonesia: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study . Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(11), 1894–1902. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i11.9914

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) imposes a burden that extends beyond glycaemic control, affecting physical functioning, emotional wellbeing, social participation and the environmental conditions in which people manage their illness. Facility-based descriptions of the full WHOQOL-BREF domain profile, reported on the WHO-recommended transformed metric, remain scarce for Indonesian adults with T2DM, which limits the ability of health promotion services to identify which dimensions of life are most affected locally. This study aimed to describe the quality of life of adults with T2DM attending a referral hospital in Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia, using the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF).


Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at RSUD dr. Soekardjo Tasikmalaya from 23 July to September 2025. One hundred adults with T2DM were recruited by consecutive sampling; eligibility required an age of at least 18 years, pharmacological treatment for at least six months, and the absence of severe complications or cognitive impairment. Data comprised sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, a medication-history questionnaire, a reproductive-history questionnaire administered to women only, and the WHOQOL-BREF. Items 3, 4 and 26 were reverse-scored before domain scoring, and domain scores were transformed to the WHO 0-100 metric. All four domains departed from normality and are summarised as median with interquartile range. Analysis was descriptive; no inferential or association testing was performed.


Results: Participants had a mean age of 58.95 years (SD 8.88) and a median illness duration of 4.00 years; 60 (60.0%) were women. The WHOQOL-BREF showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.961 overall; 0.862-0.914 across domains). On the transformed 0-100 metric, median domain scores were 56.25 (IQR 46.09-68.75) for environment, 57.14 (IQR 42.86-72.32) for physical health, 58.33 (IQR 41.67-75.00) for social relationships and 62.50 (IQR 45.83-76.04) for psychological health. The four domain medians lay within a 6.25-point range, with environment lowest and psychological health highest. Sixty-two participants (62.0%) rated their overall quality of life as good or very good, whereas 46 (46.0%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their health.


Conclusion: Adults with T2DM at this referral hospital had median scores between 56.25 and 62.50 on the 0-100 metric across the four WHOQOL-BREF domains, with the environmental domain scoring lowest and the psychological domain highest. Because the domains scored within a narrow band, health promotion responses should address the domain profile as a whole rather than any single dimension. These descriptive findings identify priorities for testing in appropriately designed analytical studies.

  1. Magliano DJ, Boyko EJ; IDF Diabetes Atlas 10th edition scientific committee. IDF DIABETES ATLAS [Internet]. 10th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581934/
  2. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2020;38(1):10-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-as01.
  3. Chen L, Li L, Qiao K, Qiao Z, Xiang Y, Zhou J, et al. Exploring factors influencing the quality of life in diabetes: a network analysis-based study. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1431772. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1431772.
  4. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299-310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.
  5. World Health Organization. WHOQOL User Manual [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/4c5cd94a-599e-450f-9141-4a21a7b74849/content
  6. Rokhman MR, Arifin B, Broggi B, Verhaar AF, Zulkarnain Z, Satibi S, et al. Impaired health-related quality of life due to elevated risk of developing diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Indonesia. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0295934. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295934.
  7. Permana H, Liem MV, Soetedjo NNM. Validation of the Indonesian Version of the Asian Diabetes Quality of Life Questionnaire. Acta Med Indones. 2021;53(2):143-148. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34251341/
  8. Goh SGK, Rusli BN, Khalid BAK. Diabetes quality of life perception in a multiethnic population. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(7):1677-1686. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0885-3.
  9. Kumait AS. Quality of Life of Diabetic Patients Type -2- in Urban and Rural Areas in Kirkuk City (Comparative Study. Mosul J Nurs. 2014;2(1):38-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.33899/mjn.2014.162927.
  10. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
  11. Eseadi C, Amedu AN, Ilechukwu LC, Ngwu MO, Ossai OV. Accessibility and utilization of healthcare services among diabetic patients: Is diabetes a poor man’s ailment? World J Diabetes. 2023;14(10):1493-1501. doi: https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v14.i10.1493.
  12. Mahmood KA, Saleh AM. Barriers and facilitators influencing access to and utilization of primary healthcare services in Kurdistan-region, Iraq: a cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(7):3409-3417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000957.
  13. Burmeister J, Pham MN, Bohler F, North C. Diabetic retinopathy in rural communities: a review of barriers to access of care and potential solutions. Ann Med. 2025;57(1):2522323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2522323.
  14. Minata S, Kudou G, Imaoka S. The Impact of Diabetes Complications on the Physical Function of Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e57867. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57867.
  15. Sendekie AK, Limenh LW, Bizuneh GK, Kasahun AE, Wondm SA, Tamene FB, et al. Psychological distress and its impact on glycemic control in patients with diabetes, Northwest Ethiopia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1488023. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1488023.
  16. Molla IB, Berhie MA, Germossa GN, Hailu FB. Perceived social supports and associated factors among diabetes mellitus patients. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2022;21(2):1651-1659. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-01116-x.
  17. Hasan AA, Ismail A, Noor H. The Influence of Social Support on Self-Care Behavior among T2DM Patients. SAGE Open Nurs. 2024;10:23779608231219137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608231219137.
  18. Miller TA, DiMatteo MR. Importance of family/social support and impact on adherence to diabetic therapy. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:421-426. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S36368.
  19. Lin K, Wang J, Bai X, Liu Y. Social isolation in people with type 2 diabetes: A concept analysis. Heliyon. 2024;10(16):e36261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36261.
  20. Ezzatvar Y, Caballero Ó, Duclos-Bastias D, Yáñez-Sepúlveda R, García-Hermoso A. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for type 2 diabetes onset: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025;223:112124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112124.
  21. Vafopoulou E, Christodoulou N, Papathanasiou IV. Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life Among Elderly Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Registered in the Community. Cureus. 2024;16(4):e58986. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.58986.
  22. Katadi S, Andayani TM, Endarti D. The Correlation of Treatment Adherence with Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. J Manaj Pelayanan Farm. 2019;9(1):19-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmpf.42927.
  23. Wu M, Xu X, Zhao R, Bai X, Zhu B, Zhao Z. Effect of Pharmacist-Led Interventions on Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Study from the Chinese Population. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023;17:119-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S394201.
  24. Boulet SL, Smith RA, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Warner L. Health-Related Quality of Life for Women Ever Experiencing Infertility or Difficulty Staying Pregnant. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(10):1918-1926. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2307-y.
  25. Kayyal M, Ahmadi S, Sadeghi G, Rasoulian-Barzoki E, Norouzi S, Abdi F, et al. Investigating factors affecting the quality of life of women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025;25(1):201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07322-8.
  26. Marchetti D, Carrozzino D, Fraticelli F, Fulcheri M, Vitacolonna E. Quality of Life in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:7058082. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7058082

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.