DOI : https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i11.9877

Comparative Study of Gender-Based Health Policies in Indonesia and the Philippines: Strategies and Equity Impact

Budhi Rahardjo (1), Ismi Dwi Astuti Nurhaeni (2), Anik Lestari (3), Widiyanto (4)
(1) Development Extension/Community Empowerment, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
(3) Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
(4) Department of Extension and Agricultural Communication, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite :
Rahardjo, B., Ismi Dwi Astuti Nurhaeni, Anik Lestari, & Widiyanto. (2026). Comparative Study of Gender-Based Health Policies in Indonesia and the Philippines: Strategies and Equity Impact . Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(11), 911–1923. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i11.9877
Citation Format :

Introduction: Gender equality remains a central challenge in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDGs 3 and 5, in Southeast Asia. This study compares gender-based health policies in Indonesia and the Philippines, focusing on how policy strategies and implementation affect health equity.


Methods: This study employed a qualitative comparative design (Mill's Method of Difference), analysing national policy documents from 2015 to 2025. The study is grounded in Sabatier and Mazmanian’s policy implementation framework and intersectionality theory to provide a comprehensive evaluation of both countries’ approaches.


Results: The Philippines demonstrates a relatively explicit rights-based policy architecture, with clearer legal mandates, institutional responsibilities, and documented implementation mechanisms. Indonesia relies more heavily on gender mainstreaming across broader development and health-planning instruments, with implementation responsibilities distributed across existing institutions. The comparison identifies differences in health-worker training, community participation, monitoring arrangements, and access-related patterns. However, population-level health indicators are interpreted as contextual and corroborative evidence rather than as direct measures of policy effectiveness, because the study design cannot establish causal effects.


Conclusion: The comparison suggests that gender-responsive health policy implementation is associated with the configuration of legal mandates, institutional capacity, contextual conditions, and equity-oriented community participation. Policy learning from the Philippine case may inform Indonesia, but implementation would require adaptation to Indonesia's decentralised governance and sociocultural context.

  1. Bappenas. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020-2024 [Internet]. Jakarta; 2020. Available from: https://www.bappenas.go.id
  2. World Health Organization. Gender and Health Policy in Southeast Asia [Internet]. Geneva; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int
  3. Natarajan S, Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Chaiyasut C. Addressing health inequities in Southeast Asia: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Reg Health - Southeast Asia [Internet]. 2024;28(4):100455. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2024.100455
  4. United Nations. Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action [Internet]. New York; 1995. Available from: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/01/beijing-declaration
  5. World Health Organization. Gender Mainstreaming for Health Managers: A Practical Approach [Internet]. Geneva; 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241501057
  6. Sabatier PA, Mazmanian DA. The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis. Policy Stud J. 1980;8(4):538–60.
  7. Sen G, Ostlin P. Gender Inequity in Health: Why it Exists and How We Can Change It. Glob Public Health [Internet]. 2008;3 Suppl 1(Sup 1):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441690801900795
  8. Lipsky M. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation; 1980.
  9. Crenshaw K. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Rev. 1991;43(6):1241–99.
  10. UN Women. ASEAN Gender Outlook [Internet]. New York; 2024. Available from: https://data.unwomen.org/publications/asean-gender-outlook-2024
  11. Philippine Commission on Women. Magna Carta of Women [Internet]. Manila; 2021. Available from: https://pcw.gov.ph
  12. Republic of the Philippines. Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act [Internet]. Manila; 2012. Available from: https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph
  13. ASEAN Secretariat. Gender Mainstreaming Strategic Framework 2021--2025 [Internet]. Jakarta; 2022. Available from: https://asean.org/book/asean-gender-mainstreaming-strategic-framework-2021-2025/
  14. Van VTS, Uy J, Bagas J, Ulep VGT. National multisectoral governance challenges of implementing the Philippines’ Reproductive Health Law. Health Policy Plan [Internet]. 2021;37(2):269–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab092
  15. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications; 2017.
  16. Ragin CC. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1987.
  17. Mill JS. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and Methods of Scientific Investigation, Volume 1. John W. Parker; 1843.
  18. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion: First International Conference on Health Promotion, Ottawa, 21 November 1986 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/1986/11/21/default-calendar/first-international-conference-on-health-promotion
  19. President of the Republic of Indonesia. Presidential Instruction No. 9 of 2000 on Gender Mainstreaming in National Development [Internet]. Jakarta; 2000. Available from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/285278/inpres-no-9-tahun-2000-pengarusutamaan-gender-dalam-pembangunan-nasional
  20. Van VTS, Uy J, Bagas J, Ulep VGT. Trends in National-Level Governance and Implementation of the Philippines’ Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law from 2014 to 2020. Glob Health Sci Pract [Internet]. 2021;9(3):548–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00184
  21. Ministry of Social Affairs Republic of Indonesia. Evaluation of the Family Hope Program [Internet]. Jakarta; 2023. Available from: https://kemensos.go.id
  22. Republic of the Philippines. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 10354 (Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012) [Internet]. Manila; 2013. Available from: https://unifast.gov.ph/assets/pdf/gad/IRR-of-RA-10354.pdf
  23. Rizkianti A, Saptarini I, Rachmalina R. Perceived Barriers in Accessing Health Care and the Risk of Pregnancy Complications in Indonesia. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:761–72. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S310850.
  24. WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). Addressing gender-related inequities in health in the Philippines [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 May 21. Available from: https://tdr.who.int/newsroom/news/item/21-05-2025-addressing-gender-related-inequities-in-health-in-the-philippines
  25. Rizkianti A, Saptarini I, Rachmalina R. Perceived Barriers in Accessing Health Care and the Risk of Pregnancy Complications in Indonesia. Int J Womens Health. 2021;13:761–72. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S310850.
  26. World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group UD. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2023: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. Geneva; 2025.
  27. Rizkianti A, Afifah T, Saptarini I, Rakhmadi MF. Women’s decision-making autonomy in the household and the use of maternal health services: an Indonesian case study. Midwifery. 2020;90:102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816.
  28. Philippine Commission on Women, Department of the Interior and Local Government, Department of Budget and Management, National Economic and Development Authority. Joint Memorandum Circular No. 2024-01: Revised Guidelines on the Localization of the Magna Carta of Women [Internet]. 2024. Available from: https://pcw.gov.ph/pcw-dilg-dbm-neda-joint-memorandum-circular-2024-01-revised-guidelines-on-the-localization-of-the-magna-carta-of-women/
  29. WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). Addressing gender-related inequities in health in the Philippines [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2025 May 21. Available from: https://tdr.who.int/newsroom/news/item/21-05-2025-addressing-gender-related-inequities-in-health-in-the-philippines
  30. Rizkianti A, Afifah T, Saptarini I, Rakhmadi MF. Women’s decision-making autonomy in the household and the use of maternal health services: an Indonesian case study. Midwifery. 2020;90:102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.