Psychosocial Determinants of Antenatal Care Utilisation in Palopo City, Indonesia: An Integrated Health Belief Model and Intention-Based Approach

  • Dyah Tahir Faculty of Health, Mega Buana University, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Evawati Uly Faculty of Health, Mega Buana University, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Fadli Fadli Faculty of Health, Mega Buana University, Palopo, Indonesia
  • Andi Sastria Ahmad Faculty of Health, Mega Buana University, Palopo, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i8.8718
Keywords: Antenatal Care, Health Belief Model, Behavioural Intention, Pregnant Women, Psychosocial Factors

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal care (ANC) is an essential maternal health service for preventing pregnancy complications. However, ANC utilisation remains suboptimal in many developing countries, including Indonesia. This study examined psychosocial determinants associated with ANC utilisation using an integrated Health Belief Model and an intention-based behavioural framework among pregnant women in Palopo City, Indonesia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 109 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters at Pontap Health Center, Palopo City, Indonesia. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to examine direct and indirect associations among psychosocial constructs, intention, and ANC behaviour.

Results: Knowledge was inversely associated with intention (β = -0.410; p = 0.030), while risk perception (β = 0.333; p < 0.001), subjective norms (β = 0.187; p = 0.001), and self-efficacy (β = 0.893; p < 0.001) were positively associated with intention. Intention was positively associated with ANC behaviour (β = 0.598; p < 0.001). In contrast, knowledge and self-efficacy did not have significant direct associations with ANC behaviour. The reported indirect effects suggest a potential mediating role for intention. These findings highlight psychosocial and intention-based pathways associated with ANC behaviour among pregnant women in Indonesia.

Conclusion: This study highlights the association between psychosocial factors, particularly behavioural intention, and ANC behaviour among pregnant women. Health-promotion strategies that address risk perception, subjective norms, and self-efficacy may support ANC attendance. Longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to examine these relationships over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Jiao B, Iversen I, Sato R, Pecenka C, Khan S, Baral R, et al. Association between achieving adequate antenatal care and health-seeking behaviors: A study of Demographic and Health Surveys in 47 low- and middle-income countries. PLOS Med [Internet]. 2024 Jul 5;21(7): e1004421. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004421
  2. Anjelika R, Bagoes Widjanarko, Ayun Sriatmi. Maternal Compliance in Utilisation of Antenatal Care Services on the Incidence of Preeclampsia: Literature Review. Media Publ Promosi Kesehat Indones [Internet]. 2024 Sep 2;7(9):2288–96. Available from: https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/MPPKI/article/view/5858
  3. Sserwanja Q, Musaba MW, Kamara K, Mutisya LM, Mukunya D. Status of the latest 2016 World Health Organization recommended frequency of antenatal care contacts in Sierra Leone: a nationally representative survey. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2022;22(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08594-y
  4. Lee S, Adam E, Kanyike AM, Wani S, Kasibante S, Mukunya D, et al. Compliance with the WHO recommended 8+ antenatal care contacts schedule among postpartum mothers in eastern Uganda: A cross-sectional study. Stanikzai MH, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2024 Dec 9;19(12): e0314769. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314769
  5. Priyanath HMS, RVSPK R, RGN M. Methods and Rule-of-Thumbs in The Determination of Minimum Sample Size When Appling Structural Equation Modelling: A Review. J Soc Sci Res [Internet]. 2020 Mar 19; 15:102–7. Available from: https://rajpub.com/index.php/jssr/article/view/8670
  6. Uwimana G, Elhoumed M, Gebremedhin MA, Qi Q, Azalati MM, Wang L, et al. Association between adequacy of antenatal care and neonatal outcomes in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study design using the Rwanda demographic and health surveys. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):1–11.
  7. Giles ML, Mason E, Muñoz FM, Moran AC, Lambach P, Merten S, et al. Antenatal care service delivery and factors affecting effective tetanus vaccine coverage in low- and middle-income countries: Results of the Maternal Immunisation and Antenatal Care Situational analysis (MIACSA) project. Vaccine [Internet]. 2020 Jul;38(33):5278–85. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X20306447
  8. Gamberini C, Angeli F, Ambrosino E. Exploring solutions to improve antenatal care in resource-limited settings: an expert consultation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2022;22(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04778-w
  9. Kasagama E, Todd J, Renju J. Factors associated with changes in adequate antenatal care visits among pregnant women aged 15-49 years in Tanzania from 2004 to 2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):18. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-021-04350-y
  10. Misu F, Gasbarro D, Alam K. Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Matern Child Health J [Internet]. 2025 Jun 3;29(6):741–66. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9
  11. Arroyave L, Saad GE, Victora CG, Barros AJD. Inequalities in antenatal care coverage and quality: an analysis from 63 low and middle-income countries using the ANCq content-qualified coverage indicator. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20(1):1–10.
  12. Ministry of Health Indonesia. The 2023 Indonesia Health Survey in Numbers [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/ski-2023-dalam-angka/
  13. Penman S V., Beatson RM, Walker EH, Goldfeld S, Molloy CS. Barriers to accessing and receiving antenatal care: Findings from interviews with Australian women experiencing disadvantage. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2023 Dec 27;79(12):4672–86. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jan.15724
  14. Md Suhaimi TM, Ismail A, Ismail R, Rasudin NS, Mohd Noor N, Jayapalan A, et al. Influence of maternal risk perception and vaccination knowledge on childhood vaccination intentions. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):671. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21815-3
  15. Sewpaul R, Crutzen R, Reddy P. Psychosocial determinants of the intention and self-efficacy to attend antenatal appointments among pregnant adolescents and young women in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2022 Sep 23;22(1):1809. Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-022-14138-0
  16. Fatma Mutia, Anto J. Hadi, Rusdiyah. Factors Influencing Pregnant Women’s ANC Examination Behavior in the work Area of Batangtoru Public Health Centertapanuli Selatan Regency. Media Publ Promosi Kesehat Indones [Internet]. 2023 Sep 7;6(9):1887–97. Available from: https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/MPPKI/article/view/4089
  17. Anshebo AA, Markos Y, Behera S, Gopalan N. Factors associated with antenatal care utilization among women with disabilities in Ethiopia: Using Andersen’ s Behaviour Model of Health Service Use. Glob Public Health [Internet]. 2025;5(6):1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004759
  18. Choudhary N, Kumar R, Kumar M, Khetan M, Kumar R, Arora S, et al. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports Anxiety among pregnant women in the second and third trimesters: A qualitative study. J Affect Disord Reports [Internet]. 2026;24(September 2025):101045. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101045
  19. Che Mohamed N, Moey S-F, Lim BC. Validity and Reliability of Health Belief Model Questionnaire for Promoting Breast Self-examination and Screening Mammogram for Early Cancer Detection. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev [Internet]. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):2865–73. Available from: http://journal.waocp.org/article_88749.html
  20. Ryum T, Nikolaos Kazantzis. Elucidating the process-based emphasis in cognitive behavioral therapy. J Context Behav Sci [Internet]. 2024 Jul; 33:100819. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212144724000991
  21. Koivu AM, Näsänen-Gilmore PK, Hunter PJ, Muthiani Y, Isojärvi J, Heimonen O, et al. Antenatal interventions to address harmful behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in the prevention of low birth weight. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. 2023 Jun;117: S148–59. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002916523397545
  22. Taflinger S, Sattler S. A situational test of the health belief model: How perceived susceptibility mediates the effects of the environment on behavioral intentions. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2024 Apr; 346:116715. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116715
  23. Warri D, George A. Perceptions of pregnant women of reasons for late initiation of antenatal care: A qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–12.
  24. Maharaj R, Mohammadnezhad M. Perception of pregnant women towards early antenatal visit in Fiji: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2022 Dec 10;22(1):111. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-022-04455-y
  25. Uyanik A, Koç G, Ardiç M. The effect of pregnancy health literacy on risk perception in pregnancy and pregnancy anxiety. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):664. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-025-07792-w
  26. Wu S-W, Chiang P-Y. Exploring the Mediating Effects of the Theory of Planned Behavior on the Relationships between Environmental Awareness, Green Advocacy, and Green Self-Efficacy on the Green Word-of-Mouth Intention. Sustainability [Internet]. 2023 Aug 8;15(16):12127. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12127
  27. Mane UR, Salunkhe JA, Kakade S. Family Support to Women During Pregnancy and Its Impact on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes. Cureus. 2024;16(6):1–18.
  28. Shorey S, Lopez V. Self-Efficacy in a Nursing Context. In: Health Promotion in Health Care – Vital Theories and Research [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 352–356. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-63135-2_12
  29. Gandomi N, Sharifzadeh G, Torshizi M, Norozi E. The effect of educational intervention based on self-efficacy theory on pregnancy anxiety and childbirth outcomes among Iranian primiparous women. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2022 Jan;11(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1548_20
  30. Fang L, Zhang Q, Zhou N, Chen J, Lou H. Influencing factors and mechanisms promoting proactive health behavior intention: an integration of the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Public Health, 13(July), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1629046
Published
2026-08-19
How to Cite
Tahir, D., Uly, E., Fadli, F., & Sastria Ahmad, A. (2026). Psychosocial Determinants of Antenatal Care Utilisation in Palopo City, Indonesia: An Integrated Health Belief Model and Intention-Based Approach. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 9(8), 1544-1553. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i8.8718
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 8 (2026)
Section
Research Article

Copyright (c) 2026 Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.