Needs Assessment of Sexual Harassment Protection Education Model for Children with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Cherly Marlina Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Evi Martha Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Rita Damayanti Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Besral Faculty of Public Health, University of Indonesia, Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Keywords: Children with Intellectual Disabilities, Needs Assessment, Learning Media, Sexual Harassment Protection, Teachers

Abstract

Introduction: Children with intellectual disabilities face a high risk of sexual harassment, yet self-protection interventions for this population remain limited and tend to be reactive. National policies and reproductive health modules are available, implementation gaps at the operational level persist; therefore, teachers require structured pedagogical support to effectively deliver self-protection materials.

Methods: These qualitative needs assessment study was conducted in five special education schools for children with intellectual disabilities (SLB-C) in Bandung, Indonesia. Data were collected from 11 teachers and 5 principals through focus group discussion and in-depth interviews. This study explored experiences, current practices, systemic barriers, and the specific requirements for sexual harassment protection education. Data were transcribed verbatim and evaluated using thematic content analysis.

Results: The findings were classified into three main themes. First, factors shaping educational needs highlighted that the urgency of education is often hindered by a lack of institutional support and parental denial regarding children's vulnerability. Second, current practices and implementation gaps revealed that current education remains situational and is impeded by students' limited working memory and unsupervised gadget exposure. Third, design requirements for education formulated design specifications emphasizing that educational methods must be collaborative and gradually repeated (spaced repetition). The required learning media must be simple, concrete, visual, interactive, and multisensory.

Conclusion: Sexual harassment protection education for children with intellectual disabilities requires an integrated collaborative approach involving students, teachers, parents, and school institutions. The availability of multisensory media and structured modules is essential to accommodate children's cognitive limitations, simultaneously serving as a pedagogical instrument that enables teachers to deliver protection instruction in a directed and consistent manner that synergizes with the family environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Carrellas A, Resko SM, Day AG. Sexual victimization and intellectual disabilities among child welfare involved youth. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 May; 115:104986. https://doi/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.104986
  2. Jojo N, Nattala P, Seshadri S, Krishnakumar P, Thomas S. Knowledge of sexual abuse and resistance ability among children with intellectual disability. Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Feb; 136:105985. https://doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105985
  3. Daigneault I, Paquette G, De La Sablonnière-Griffin M, Dion J. Childhood Sexual Abuse, Intellectual Disability, and Subsequent Physical and Mental Health Disorders: A Matched Cohort Study. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Mar 1;128(2):134–44. https://doi:10.1352/1944-7558-128.2.134
  4. Svae GB, Blixt L, Søndenaa E. Personal and sexual boundaries: the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities. BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):1773. https://doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14181-x
  5. Svae GB, Hassel B, Søndenaa E. People with intellectual disabilities and harmful sexual behaviour: Professionals’ views on the barriers to prevent harm. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2023 Jan 16;36(1):176–85. https://doi:10.1111/jar.13048
  6. Hole R, Schnellert L, Cantle G. Sex: What Is the Big Deal? Exploring Individuals’ with Intellectual Disabilities Experiences with Sex Education. Qual Health Res. 2022 Feb 20;32(3):453–64. https://doi:10.1177/10497323211057090
  7. Gupta B. Sex Education Training as Capacity Building Tool for Mothers and their Children with Intellectual Disability: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2024 Jul 11;6(3):251–7. https://doi:10.1177/26318318241265829
  8. Nyberg A, Ferm U, Bornman J. School-Based Abuse Prevention Programs for Children with Disabilities: A Qualitative Study of Components and Methods. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education. 2021 Dec 13;45(2):252–67. https://doi/10.1017/jsi.2021.18
  9. Correa AB, Castro Á, Barrada JR. Attitudes Towards the Sexuality of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Sex Disabil. 2022 Jun 24;40(2):261–97. https://doi/10.1007/s11195-021-09719-7
  10. Mannion J, Vincent LB, Kroeger SD, Blee T, Daly O, Gallagher R, et al. Researching Together: Researchers with and Without Disabilities Engage Across National and Interdisciplinary Boundaries. Br J Learn Disabil. 2025 Mar 4;53(1):192–202. https://doi/10.1111/bld.12634
  11. Kamaludin NN, Muhamad R, Mat Yudin Z, Zakaria R. “Providing Sex Education Is Challenging”: Malay Mothers’ Experience in Implementing Sex Education to Their Children with Intellectual Disabilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7249. https://doi/10.3390/ijerph19127249
  12. Phasha TN, Runo M. Sexuality Education in Schools for Learners with Intellectual Disabilities in Kenya: Empowerment or Disempowerment? Sex Disabil. 2017 Sep 27;35(3):353–70. https://doi/10.1007/s11195-017-9480-1
  13. Ramírez González A. Teacher Training as an Obligation to Prevent Sexual Violence against Children: Meeting International Standards. The Age of Human Rights Journal. 2025 Dec 30;(26): e9877. https://doi/10.17561/tahrj.v26.9877
  14. Brown M, McCann E, Truesdale M, Linden M, Marsh L. The Design, Content and Delivery of Relationship and Sexuality Education Programmes for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review of the International Evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 18;17(20):7568. https://doi/10.3390/ijerph17207568
  15. Curtiss SL, Kammes R. Understanding the Risk of Sexual Abuse for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities from an Ecological Framework. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2020 Mar 27;17(1):13–20. https://doi/10.1111/jppi.12318
  16. Dinora P, Prohn S, Cramer EP, Dellinger-Wray M, Mayton C, D’Aguiliar A. Testing the Efficacy of Leadership for Empowerment and Abuse Prevention (LEAP), a Healthy Relationship Training Intervention for People with Intellectual Disability. Developmental Disabilities Network Journal. 2021 Oct 20;2(1). https://doi/10.59620/2694-1104.1041
  17. Kammes RR, Liffley E, Fisher MH. Perceived Vulnerability and Parents’ Views on Intimate Relationships: Adults with Intellectual Disabilities Versus Their Siblings. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2026 Jan 25;70(1):105–15. https://doi/10.1111/jir.70061
  18. Naker D. Preventing violence against children at schools in resource-poor environments: Operational culture as an overarching entry point. Aggress Violent Behav. 2019 Jul; 47:268–73. https://doi/10.1016/j.avb.2019.04.004
  19. World Health Organization. School-based violence prevention: a practical handbook. [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2026 Jul 11]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/324930
  20. Collins SE, Clifasefi SL, Stanton J, The LEAP Advisory Board, Straits KJE, Gil-Kashiwabara E, et al. Community-based participatory research (CBPR): Towards equitable involvement of community in psychology research. American Psychologist. 2018 Oct;73(7):884–98. https://doi/10.1037/amp0000167
  21. Frawley P, O’Shea A. ‘Nothing about us without us’: sex education by and for people with intellectual disability in Australia. Sex Educ. 2020 Jul 3;20(4):413–24. https://doi/10.1080/14681811.2019.1668759
  22. Freckelton QC I. Disabilities and Dangerous Digital Footprints: The Need for Light-Touch Guidance. Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities. 2020 Feb 20;6(4). https://doi/10.19080/GJIDD.2020.06.555695
  23. Tassé MJ, Luckasson R, Schalock RL. The Relation Between Intellectual Functioning and Adaptive Behavior in the Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec 1;54(6):381–90. https://doi/10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.381
  24. Khemka I, Hickson L, Mallory SB. Evaluation of a Decision-Making Curriculum for Teaching Adolescents with Disabilities to Resist Negative Peer Pressure. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jul 18;46(7):2372–84. https://doi/10.1007/s10803-016-2770-0
  25. Miltenberger RG, Egemo-Helm KR. Behavioral Skills Training for Teaching Sexual Abuse Prevention Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities. In Applied Behavior Analysis Advanced Guidebook: A Manual for Professional Practice. Springer. 2017;287–304.
  26. Hale ICS, Kurniawati F. Music Therapy in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: What and How. Buletin Psikologi. 2022 Jun 27;30(1):116. https://doi/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.54595
  27. Yum YN, Poon K, Lau WK, Ho FC, Sin KF, Chung KM, et al. Music therapy improves engagement and initiation for autistic children with mild intellectual disabilities: A randomized controlled study. Autism Research. 2024 Dec 7;17(12):2702–22. https://doi/10.1002/aur.3254
  28. UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education: an evidence-informed approach. UNESCO; 2018. https://doi/10.54675/UQRM6395
  29. Strnadová I, Danker J, Carter A. Scoping review on sex education for high school-aged students with intellectual disability and/or on the autism spectrum: parents’, teachers’ and students’ perspectives, attitudes and experiences. Sex Educ. 2022 May 4;22(3):361–78. https://doi/10.1080/14681811.2021.1941842
Published
2026-08-19
How to Cite
Cherly Marlina, Evi Martha, Rita Damayanti, & Besral. (2026). Needs Assessment of Sexual Harassment Protection Education Model for Children with Intellectual Disabilities. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 9(8), 1568-1576. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i8.11482
Section
Research Article