Relational Support Pathways During First Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study with Implications for Couple-Based Maternal Health Promotion

Dian Puspitasari (1), Agus Kristiyanto (2), Supriyadi Hari Respati (3), Haryani Saptaningtyas (4)
(1) Post Graduate Program of Community Empowerment, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(2) Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sports, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java Indonesia
(3) Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Moewardi General Hospital, Surakarta, Central Java Indonesia. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
(4) Post Graduate Program of Community Empowerment, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite :
Dian Puspitasari, Agus Kristiyanto, Supriyadi Hari Respati, & Haryani Saptaningtyas. (2026). Relational Support Pathways During First Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study with Implications for Couple-Based Maternal Health Promotion. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 9(9), 1742–1752. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i9.10721

Introduction: A first pregnancy involves bodily changes, emotional concerns, and adjustment to an unfamiliar role. Although husband support is widely recognised as part of pregnancy care, it is often discussed as an individual resource or as a set of supportive behaviours. This study explored how support was experienced by couples and how it developed through their everyday interactions during first pregnancy.


Methods: An exploratory qualitative study was conducted with 12 married couples, involving 24 participants who were experiencing their first pregnancy. Participants were purposively recruited from semi-urban and rural communities. Husbands and wives took part in separate in-depth interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Member checking and peer debriefing were used to support the trustworthiness of the analysis.


Results: Five interconnected themes were developed from the participants' accounts. Physical discomfort and emotional changes created new needs within the couple relationship. Support emerged in everyday exchanges, including conversations, attention to changing needs, and efforts to adjust together. The meaning of a husband's response depended partly on how his wife understood that response. Participants also linked their adjustment to shared experiences within the relationship and, for some, to spiritual ways of understanding pregnancy. These accounts informed the proposed relational support pathways, which describe movement from pregnancy-related vulnerability towards adaptation. Discomfort and uncertainty often prompted a need for reassurance and understanding. Husbands described learning how to respond as pregnancy progressed, while wives interpreted those responses in light of their relationship. Similar actions were not necessarily experienced in the same way by every participant. Spiritual beliefs also helped some participants make sense of and accept pregnancy-related difficulties.


Conclusion: Participants described first pregnancy as a personal transition experienced within a couple relationship. Communication, emotional responsiveness, changing roles, and the meanings attached to pregnancy shaped how support was experienced. Husband support appeared to develop through repeated interaction between partners rather than remaining a fixed role. These findings may inform couple-based antenatal education that addresses communication, emotional responsiveness, and family involvement.

  1. 1. Guerroumi M, Aquil A, Dahbi N, El Kherchi O, Bouighoulidne SA, Ami SA, et al. Assessment of Mental Health Comorbidities and Relief Factors in Moroccan Women during the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare [Internet]. 2024;12(15):1470. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12151470
  2. 2. Răchită AIC, Strete GE, Sălcudean A, Ghiga DV, Rădulescu F, Călinescu M, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Depression and Anxiety among Women in the Last Trimester of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2023;59(6):1009. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061009
  3. 3. Antoniou E, Stamoulou P, Tzanoulinou M-D, Orovou E. Perinatal Mental Health; The Role and the Effect of the Partner: A Systematic Review. Healthcare [Internet]. 2021;9(11):1572. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111572
  4. 4. Atif M, Farooq M, Shafiq M, Ayub G, Ilyas M. The impact of partner’s behaviour on pregnancy related outcomes and safe child-birth in Pakistan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2023;23(1):516. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05814-z
  5. 5. Lonkhuijzen RM, Rustenhoven H, Vries JHM, Wagemakers A. The role of the partner in the support of a pregnant woman’s healthy diet: an explorative qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2023;23(1):760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06072-9
  6. 6. Bedaso A, Adams J, Peng W, Sibbritt D. The mediational role of social support in the relationship between stress and antenatal anxiety and depressive symptoms among Australian women: a mediational analysis. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2021;18(1):250. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01305-6
  7. 7. Sağlam Topal B. Examining psychological well-being variables during pregnancy: partner support buffers flourishing. Curr Psychol [Internet]. 2024;43(48):36867–36883. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07058-2
  8. 8. Ocampo Rivero M, Maza Padilla LE, Orozco Gómez CJ. Relación entre apoyo social, funcionamiento familiar, características sociodemográficas y ginecobstétricas en gestantes que asisten a cuidado prenatal. Enfermería Glob [Internet]. 2025;24(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.628671
  9. 9. DiMeo A, Karlage A, Schoenherr K, Spigel L, Chakraborty S, Bazan M, et al. Cultural brokering in pregnancy care: A critical review. Int J Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2023;163(2):357–366. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15063
  10. 10. Maifita Y, Sansuwito TB, Panduragan SL. Integrating cultural norms into maternal health: Male engagement through a comprehensive caring model. Afr J Reprod Health [Internet]. 2026;30(2):70–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2026/v30i2.6
  11. 11. Sun S, An S. How the partner’s perceived psychological state affects perinatal mental health in Chinese women: multiple mediating effects of couple communication and perceived social support. Psychol Health Med [Internet]. 2026;31(2):313–329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2465652
  12. 12. Costa EC V, Castanheira E, Moreira L, Correia P, Ribeiro D, Graça Pereira M. Predictors of emotional distress in pregnant women: the mediating role of relationship intimacy. J Ment Heal [Internet]. 2020;29(2):152–160. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417545
  13. 13. Tikka SK, Thippeswamy H, Chandra PS. The Influence of Culture on Perinatal Mental Health. In: Key Topics in Perinatal Mental Health [Internet]. Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 287–302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91832-3_18
  14. 14. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE; 2021.
  15. 15. Al-Mutawtah M, Campbell E, Kubis H-P, Erjavec M. Women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2023;23(1):782. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06089-0
  16. 16. Alrida NA, Abu-Abbasl M, Ababneh AMT, Khatatbeh H, Ayed A, Al-Amer R. The Role of Spirituality and Biopsychosocial Factors in Predicting Resilience of Pregnant Women. Pastoral Psychol [Internet]. 2025;74(6):901–915. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-025-01243-1
  17. 17. Alimoradi Otaghvar M, Semsar S. An Analysis of Women’s Lived Experience of Their Husbands’ Emotional Support in Crisis Situations. Am J Fam Ther [Internet]. 2026;1–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2026.2631372
  18. 18. Vila J. Social Support and Longevity: Meta-Analysis-Based Evidence and Psychobiological Mechanisms. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2021; 12:717164. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717164
  19. 19. Devkota R, Cummings G, Hunter KF, Maxwell C, Shrestha S, Dennett L, et al. Factors influencing emotional support of older adults living in the community: a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2023; 12:186. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02346-7
  20. 20. Itzchakov G, DeMarree KG. Attitudes in an interpersonal context: Psychological safety as a route to attitude change. Front Psychol [Internet]. 2022; 13:932413. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932413
  21. 21. Rychlowska M, McKeown GJ, Sneddon I, Curran W. The Role of Contextual Information in Classifying Spontaneous Social Laughter. J Nonverbal Behav [Internet]. 2022; 46:449-466. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00412
  22. 22. Dwyer LA, Epstein RM, Feeney BC, Blair IV, Bolger N, Ferrer RA. Responsive social support serves important functions in clinical communication: Translating perspectives from relationship science to improve cancer clinical interactions. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2022; 315:115521. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115521
  23. 23. Vasquez TS, Moss C, Harris V, Visconti B. Are You Satisfied? Examining Positive Interaction and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships. J Fam Issues [Internet]. 2024;45(6):1355–1377. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231172286
  24. 24. Jolin S, Lafontaine M-F, Brassard A, Lussier Y. Which comes first? Associations between communication patterns and relationship satisfaction in couples over a 1-year period. Can J Behav Sci / Rev Can Des Sci Du Comport [Internet]. 2024;56(1):70–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000342
  25. 25. Lefebvre A, Brassard A, Jean M, Daspe M, Lafontaine M, Péloquin K. The Role of Communication in Romantic Attachment and Relationship Satisfaction: A Dyadic Longitudinal Study. J Marital Fam Ther [Internet]. 2026;52(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70127
  26. 26. Pietromonaco PR, Girme YU, Simpson JA. Attachment in couple relationships. In: Research Handbook on Couple and Family Relationships [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2025. p. 10–24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035309269.00010
  27. 27. Gillath O, Manchanda N, Brumbaugh CC, McIntyre KP, Mattingly BA. Attachment theory and the relational self. Self Identity [Internet]. 2025;1–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2025.2589769
  28. 28. Jiao C, Grzywacz JG. Understanding marital stability through work–family experiences in proximal and distal contexts: Comparing United States and Japan. Fam Relat [Internet]. 2024;73(5):3073–3088. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13043
  29. 29. Karandashev V. Cross-Cultural Variation in Relationship Initiation. In: The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Romantic Relationships [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2023. p. 267–302. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197524718.013.10
  30. 30. Lavner JA. Social context and couple relationships: considering macro-level influences on couples. In: Research Handbook on Couple and Family Relationships [Internet]. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2025. p. 359–373. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035309269.00034
  31. 31. Riyadi S, Marmi M, Madury SA, Farid M. Smoking Cessation Behavior Among Madurese Adolescents: The Role of Social Capital and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Media Publ Promosi Kesehat Indones [Internet]. 2025;8(9):971-980. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v8i9.7883
  32. 32. Marmi M, Riyadi S. Islamic principles in nursing leadership: Lesson learned from Rufaida Al-Aslami's lens and legacy. J Holist Nurs Sci [Internet]. 2025;12(2):326-332. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31603/jhns.v12i2.13718

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.