Exploring Adolescent Reproductive Health Education Needs for Digital Application Development: A Qualitative Needs Assessment

  • Eti Salafas Public Health Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Haryono Educational Technology Study Program, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Irwan Budiono Public Health Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Evi Widowati Public Health Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i8.10552
Keywords: Reproductive Health Education, Adolescent, Health Literacy, Behavioral Risks, Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescent reproductive health (ARH) education is an effort to improve health literacy and support healthy behaviours. However, many adolescents still experience limited access to credible information on reproductive health due to inadequate school-based education, sociocultural stigma, and barriers to open communication. Although digital education approaches are increasingly promoted, evidence regarding adolescents’ educational needs and stakeholder perspectives to inform contextually relevant digital interventions remains limited.  This study aims to explore adolescent reproductive health education needs and identify considerations for the future development of a digital educational application.

Methods: A qualitative needs assessment design was employed. Data were collected between September and November 2025 through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions involving junior high school students (n = 6), teachers (n = 3), and health and government stakeholders (n = 8), who were purposively selected. All interviews and discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis framework, with NVivo 15 used to support data management and coding.

Results: Six major themes were identified: reproductive health literacy gaps, adolescent behavioural risks, barriers in school-based reproductive health education, limitations in teacher capacity and learning resources, challenges in policy and programme implementation, and the need for innovative digital reproductive health education applications. These findings revealed a mismatch between adolescents’ preference for private, practical, and digitally accessible reproductive health information and the limited readiness of schools, teachers, families, and existing support systems to provide structured, credible, and non-stigmatising education. Participants emphasised the need for age-appropriate content, confidential access to information, interactive learning features, stronger teacher support, and better integration with existing school and health programmes.

Conclusion: This study provides formative empirical evidence regarding adolescent reproductive health education needs and preliminary requirements for digital application design. The findings may inform the development of adolescent-centred educational technologies and support future strategies to strengthen school-based reproductive health education, teacher capacity, and cross-sector collaboration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abdi Shahshahani M, Hashemi M, Kohan S. The effect of the reproductive health self-care educational booklet on the self‑care ability of female university students. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res [Internet]. 2023;28(6):659–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_8_22
  2. Siswati T, Widiyanto SYD, Olfah Y, Setyowati, Paramashanti BA. The impact of behavior change communication on healthy living movement-related knowledge and behavior among adolescents: A mixed-methods study. Public Heal Indones [Internet]. 2023;9(1):21–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.36685/phi.v9i1.654
  3. Nasution SL, Kistiana S, Gayatri M, Naibaho MMP. Reproductive health knowledge among adolescents in Indonesia: The role of family structure. Fam J [Internet]. 2022 Apr 4; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807221090950
  4. Muthmainnah M, Salim LA, Nurmala I, Nadia A, Salsabila AC. Enhancing health education using edutainment: A quantitative study in Malang regency, Indonesia. Media Publ Promosi Kesehat Indones [Internet]. 2025;8(5):326–36. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v8i5.7134
  5. Pinandari AW, Kågesten AE, Li M, Moreau C, van Reeuwijk M, Wilopo SA. Short-term effects of a school-based comprehensive sexuality education intervention among very young adolescents in three urban Indonesian settings: A quasi-experimental study. J Adolesc Heal [Internet]. 2023 Jul;73(1): S21–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.01.030
  6. Kågesten AE, Pinandari AW, Page A, Wilopo SA, van Reeuwijk M. Sexual wellbeing in early adolescence: a cross-sectional assessment among girls and boys in urban Indonesia. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2021;18(1):1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01199-4
  7. Peters C, Schrøder KC, Lehaff J, Vulpius J. News as they know it: Young adults’ information repertoires in the digital media landscape. Digit Journal [Internet]. 2022 Jan 2;10(1):62–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1885986
  8. Salam N, Suyanto S, Ningsih SN. Maximizing the potential of digital learning media in primary education: insights from a Systematic literature review. Indones J Educ Res Rev [Internet]. 2024 Oct 25;7(3):615–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.80617
  9. Handayani F, Nurhayati N, Kamila A. Artificial intelligence as an educational media to improve adolescent reproductive health: Research and development studies. J Keperawatan Padjadjaran [Internet]. 2022;10(3):170–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/jkp.v10i3.2104
  10. Muhlisa, Amiruddin R, Moedjiono AI, Suriah, Hadju V, Salmah U, et al. Effectiveness of health education for teenagers in the digital era: A review. Malaysian J Med Heal Sci [Internet]. 2023;19(5):399–406. Available from: https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.19.5.45
  11. Sari P, Bestari A, Martini N, Nirmala S, Yasirulhaq Y, Hartiti W, et al. An interactive learning to increase the knowledge of sexual and reproductive health among university students: A pilot study in West Java, Indonesia. J Multidiscip Healthc [Internet]. 2025 May;Volume 18:2721–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s512267
  12. Yuandari E, Rahman RTA, Haryono IA, Hidayah N, Iswandari ND, Hateriah S. The qualitative study of the phenomenon of premarital sex: between expectations and reality among adolescents in Banjarmasin. Media Publ Promosi Kesehat Indones [Internet]. 2025;8(8):621–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v8i8.7488
  13. Karima UQ, Pristya TYR, Herbawani CK. Information-seeking behavior of reproductive health based on socio-demographic among adolescents in Jakarta, Indonesia. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2023 Aug;12(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1131_22
  14. Suttor H, Yamayanti KP, Astiti NLEP, Dewi T, Chenhall RD, Ansariadi A, et al. Seeking and encountering online information for menstrual health: a qualitative study among adolescent schoolgirls in Gianyar Regency and Denpasar City, Bali, Indonesia. Sex Reprod Heal Matters [Internet]. 2024 Dec 31;32(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2024.2445936
  15. Abdul Hamid Alhassan RH, Haggerty CL, Fapohunda A, Affan NJ, Anto-Ocrah M. Exploring the use of digital educational tools for sexual and reproductive health in sub-saharan africa: systematic review. JMIR Public Heal Surveill [Internet]. 2025 Feb 26;11: e63309. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/63309
  16. Mills R, Mangone ER, Lesh N, Mohan D, Baraitser P. Chatbots to improve sexual and reproductive Health: realist synthesis. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2023 Aug 9;25: e46761. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/46761
  17. Rivenes Lafontan S, Jones F, Lama N. Exploring comprehensive sexuality education experiences and barriers among students, teachers and principals in Nepal: a qualitative study. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2024 Sep 11;21(1):131. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-024-01876-0
  18. Chavula MP, Zulu JM, Hurtig AK. Factors influencing the integration of comprehensive sexuality education into educational systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2022 Sep 29;19(1):196. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01504-9
  19. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q [Internet]. 1988 Dec 1;15(4):351–77. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/109019818801500401
  20. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
  21. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health behavior theory, research, and practice. 5th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2015.
  22. UNESCO. International technical guidance on sexuality education [Internet]. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO); 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.54675/UQRM6395
  23. Hasan K, Mahmood HR, Ether ST, Hayder T, Zannat S, Sayeed A, et al. From taboo to touchscreen: a qualitative study of digital sexual and reproductive health intervention for Bangladeshi adolescents. J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2025 Oct 7;27: e78514. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2196/78514
  24. Huang KY, Kumar M, Cheng S, Urcuyo AE, Macharia P. Applying technology to promote sexual and reproductive health and prevent gender-based violence for adolescents in low and middle-income countries: digital health strategies synthesis from an umbrella review. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1373. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08673-0
  25. Rumdari R, Setyowati S, Budiati T, Rachmawati IN. Digital support education on risky adolescent reproductive health behaviors: A systematic review. Indones J Glob Heal Res [Internet]. 2025 Apr 1;7(2):1075–86. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37287/ijghr.v7i2.5869
  26. Isaacs N, Ntinga X, Keetsi T, Bhembe L, Mthembu B, Cloete A, et al. Are mHealth interventions effective in improving the uptake of sexual and reproductive health services among adolescents? A scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2024 Jan 31;21(2):165. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020165
  27. Baral BK, Bista SK. Health literacy and menstrual hygiene practices among adolescent girls. Shiksha Shastra Saurabh [Internet]. 2025 Dec 28; 25:26–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3126/sss.v25i1.90489
  28. Baird S, Hamory J, Gezahegne K, Pincock K, Woldehanna T, Yadete W, et al. Improving menstrual health literacy through life-skills programming in rural ethiopia. Front Glob Women’s Heal [Internet]. 2022 Jul 8;3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2022.838961
  29. Long JL, Haver J, Mendoza P, Vargas Kotasek SM. The more you know, the less you stress: menstrual health literacy in schools reduces menstruation-related stress and increases self-efficacy for very young adolescent girls in mexico. Front Glob Women’s Heal [Internet]. 2022 Apr 14;3. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2022.859797/full
  30. Widman L, Choukas-Bradley S, Noar SM, Nesi J, Garrett K. Parent-adolescent sexual communication and adolescent safer sex behavior. JAMA Pediatr [Internet]. 2016 Jan 1;170(1):52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2731
  31. Emenike NW, Onukwugha FI, Sarki AM, Smith L. Adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health education: perspectives from secondary school teachers in Northern Nigeria. Sex Educ [Internet]. 2023 Jan 2;23(1):66–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2022.2028613
  32. Khosla R, Tzortziou Brown V. Implementation of sexual and reproductive health education policy in schools in Asia and Africa: A Scoping Review. Int J Sex Heal [Internet]. 2025 Apr 3;37(2):166–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2024.2409129
  33. Zulu JM, Blystad A, Haaland MES, Michelo C, Haukanes H, Moland KM. Why teach sexuality education in school? Teacher discretion in implementing comprehensive sexuality education in rural Zambia. Int J Equity Health [Internet]. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):116. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1023-1
Published
2026-08-19
How to Cite
Salafas, E., Haryono, Budiono, I., & Widowati, E. (2026). Exploring Adolescent Reproductive Health Education Needs for Digital Application Development: A Qualitative Needs Assessment . Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 9(8), 1609-1623. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i8.10552
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 8 (2026)
Section
Research Article

Copyright (c) 2026 Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.