Grammatical Hurdles in Passive Voice Construction

A Qualitative Study of Indonesian EFL Learners

  • Rayyan Cahyadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu
  • Nadrun Universitas Tadulako
  • Andi Naniwarsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu
Keywords: Passive voice, English proficiency, auxiliary verbs, grammatical errors, conceptual misunderstandings

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the challenges faced by sixth-semester students in the English Language Education Program at Muhammadiyah University of Palu in using the passive voice. The researcher employed a qualitative descriptive design, utilizing a 20-item multiple-choice test and Focus Group Discussion (FGD) interviews as research instruments. The research subjects consisted of 14 students selected using the total sampling technique. The findings revealed that the average student score was 53.2, with the following major errors: misunderstanding of the passive voice concept (50%), errors in the use of auxiliary verbs (30%), and errors in verb forms (20%). The interview results revealed that these challenges were exacerbated by limited vocabulary and a lack of deep understanding of tense formulas. These findings underscore the need for instructional strategies that focus more on the conceptual differences between active and passive sentences in the English language education curriculum.

References

Ahmed, A., & Lenchuk, I. (2020). A developmental step in the right direction: The case for concept-based instruction in the Omani ESP classroom. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.2
Almahameed, Y. S., Bataineh, K. B. A., & Ammari, R. M. (2022). The use of passive voice in news reports for political purposes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1196–1202. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.07
Alt?n, M. (2023). Tactics used in challenging activities in English language teaching. Dergi Park. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10991358
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Fadhilawati, D., Khan, A., Rachmawati, D. L., & Mansur, M. (2022). Tackling and handling students’ grammar mastery on passive voices in a higher education: Quizizz application power. Voices of English Language Education Society, 6(2), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v6i2.5661
Ha, H. T. V., & Duong, T. M. (2024). Error analysis of English passive voice use among ninth-grade Vietnamese students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2024-3002-12
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511733062
Mahdun, M., Chan, M. Y., Yap, N. T., Kasim, Z. M., & Wong, B. E. (2022). Production errors and interlanguage development patterns of L1 Malay ESL learners in the acquisition of the English passive. Issues in Language Studies, 11(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.4023.2022
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muziatun, M., Malabar, F., & Mustapa, L. (2022). Analyzing students’ passive voice difficulties. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i2.6439
Rosmiaty, R., Ratnawati, R., Yuriatson, Y., Angraeny, L., & Azani, F. M. (2023). Investigating the influence of explicit grammar instruction for Indonesian EFL students’ academic writing skills. ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching, 10(2), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i2.53641
Septy, A. P., & Juliani, R. (2023). An error analysis on the use of passive voice in descriptive text by the tenth-grade students of SMAN 1 Lubuk Alung. Journal on Education, 5(3), 9879–9890. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1869
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suprapto, S., Hasan, J. R., & Suzanne, N. (2022). Students’ error of using passive voice based on surface strategy taxonomy. Eloquence: Journal of Foreign Language, 1(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.58194/eloquence.v1i2.390
Yasim, S., Hasnawiah, H., & Roni, R. (2018). Error analysis in using passive voice. Eduvelop: Journal of English Education and Development, 2(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v2i1.23
Published
2024-07-01
How to Cite
Cahyadi, R., Nadrun, & Naniwarsih, A. (2024). Grammatical Hurdles in Passive Voice Construction: A Qualitative Study of Indonesian EFL Learners. Journal of Foreign Language and Educational Research, 7(2), 42-29. https://doi.org/10.31934/jofler.v7i2.11088