Journal Metrics
Scopus Source Metrics
1.1
CiteScore 2025
0.270
SJR 2025
0.569
SNIP 2025
CiteScore, SJR, and SNIP are annual source-level indicators displayed in Scopus Source Details. The journal’s CiteScore 2025 is based on 142 citations received during 2022 to 2025 and 125 documents published during the same period. Users should consult the official source profile for the latest values, calculation methodology, subject categories, percentile rankings, document counts, citation counts, and coverage information.
View Scopus Source ProfileSCImago Journal Rank
0.270
SJR 2025
Q3
Best Quartile 2025
5
SCImago H-index
SJR, quartile, and h-index values are reported by SCImago Journal & Country Rank using Scopus-indexed data. JPHP is listed in the Pharmaceutical Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health categories, with a reported Q3 quartile for 2025. These indicators are maintained by SCImago and should not be described as Scopus Content Selection and Advisory Board evaluations or decisions.
View SCImago Journal ProfileGoogle Scholar Citation Profile
398
Total Citations
9
h-index
7
i10-index
Profile ID: jyF9GkYAAAAJ
Provider: Google Scholar Citations
Metric coverage: All-time
Provider: Google Scholar Citations
Metric coverage: All-time
Google Scholar citation indicators are updated dynamically and generally have broader coverage than Scopus-based indicators. Google Scholar and Scopus values should therefore not be interpreted as directly equivalent or compared as though they originate from the same database and calculation method.
View Google Scholar ProfileMetric information: CiteScore, CiteScoreTracker, SJR, and SNIP are displayed in Scopus Source Details. SJR, quartile, and h-index information is also presented separately by SCImago Journal & Country Rank using Scopus-indexed data. Total citations, h-index, and i10-index are presented from the journal’s public Google Scholar profile. These providers use different database coverage, inclusion criteria, update schedules, and calculation methods. Their values should not be compared as though they originate from the same dataset.
Metric values should be reviewed against the linked provider profiles and updated whenever new annual indicators or revised citation data are released.
