Correction Retraction Policy
The Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy is committed to maintaining an accurate and trustworthy scholarly record. When a material error or integrity concern is identified after publication, the journal may issue a correction, expression of concern, or retraction according to the nature, severity, and reliability of the available evidence. Cases are handled fairly, transparently, and in accordance with recognized publication-ethics procedures.
A correction is issued when an error affects the accuracy, clarity, attribution, or interpretation of a published article but does not invalidate its central findings or conclusions. Published content is not altered in a way that obscures the historical record.
Authors, editors, reviewers, readers, institutions, or other parties may report a suspected error to the editorial office.
The Editorial Board verifies the issue and evaluates its effect on the article, readers, and scholarly record.
The editor determines whether a formal correction is required and consults authors or relevant experts when necessary.
A dated correction notice is published and linked to the original article. The article is updated where appropriate, with a clear statement describing the change.
The journal may publish an Expression of Concern when credible evidence raises serious doubt about an article but the investigation is incomplete, inconclusive, delayed, or dependent on findings from an institution or another authorized body. The notice remains linked to the article and is replaced or updated when a final outcome is reached.
Retraction is considered when a published article is unreliable, contains serious ethical violations, reports invalid findings, or presents a substantial risk of misleading readers. Retraction corrects the literature and is not used solely to punish authors.
Fabrication, falsification, major error, or invalid analysis.
Plagiarism, duplicate publication, or substantial redundant publication.
Missing required ethical approval, invalid consent, or serious participant-protection failures.
Manipulation or serious compromise of the peer review or editorial process.
Publication of material or data without required permission or lawful authorization.
Undisclosed conduct that materially damages the article’s reliability or integrity.