Respiratory Symptom Composite, Individual Characteristics, and Area PM10 Measurements among Makassar Flour Mill Workers

Tiara Rahmadhani (1), Atjo Wahyu (2), Yahya Thamrin (3), Masyita Muis (4), Andi Arsunan (5)
(1) Department of Occupational safety and health, Faculty of public health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
(2) Department of Occupational safety and health, Faculty of public health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
(3) Department of Occupational safety and health, Faculty of public health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
(4) Department of Occupational safety and health, Faculty of public health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
(5) Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of public health, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite :
Rahmadhani, T., Wahyu, A., Thamrin, Y., Muis, M., & Arsunan, A. (2026). Respiratory Symptom Composite, Individual Characteristics, and Area PM10 Measurements among Makassar Flour Mill Workers. Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy, 6(3), 490–498. https://doi.org/10.56338/jphp.v6i3.11536

Introduction: This study described an unvalidated respiratory symptom composite, individual characteristics, and concurrent spirometric screening among flour mill workers in Makassar, with short-duration area PM10 measurements providing descriptive workplace context.


Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted in December 2025. Archived aggregate tables included data for 87 workers; complete participation and source-data completeness could not be verified. The primary outcome was a study-specific, unvalidated 12-item composite using a ≥50% affirmative-response threshold. Crude prevalence ratios (PRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with nominal 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reconstructed from categorical counts. Ten 10-minute area PM10 measurements were summarized separately. The unverifiable adjusted model was removed.


Results: The composite threshold was met by 49/87 workers (56.3%). Crude PRs were 1.61 (95% CI 1.08–2.40) for the respiratory history composite, 2.44 (1.65–3.62) for service >5 years, and 2.62 (1.60–4.31) for former or current smoking versus never smoking. PPE use had a PR of 1.47 (0.996–2.180), and the exercise composite had a PR of 1.04 (0.72–1.52). Abnormal spirometric screening co-occurred with a higher composite-positive proportion (PR 2.56; 1.39–4.73), without implying a predictive relationship. PM10 ranged from 5 to 902 µg/m³. Estimates were unadjusted and CIs did not account for possible work-area clustering.


Conclusion: Recorded individual characteristics differed in their crude association with the unvalidated symptom composite. These findings do not establish respiratory disease prevalence, independent determinants, or causation. Area measurements cannot establish individual PM10–symptom associations or regulatory compliance. The findings identify priorities for better-documented exposure assessment and respiratory surveillance.


 

  1. Lagiso ZA, Mekonnen WT, Abaya SW, Takele AK, Workneh HM. Chronic respiratory symptoms, lung function and associated factors among flour mill factory workers in Hawassa city, southern Ethiopia: “comparative cross-sectional study”. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):909. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08950-9.
  2. Alemseged EA, Takele AK, Zele Y, Abaya SW, Kiros KG, Mehari M, et al. Assessment of Chronic Respiratory Health Symptoms and Associated Factors Among Flour Mill Factory Workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Asthma Allergy. 2020;13:483-492. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S273820.
  3. Demeke D, Haile DW. Assessment of Respiratory Symptoms and Pulmonary Function Status among Workers of Flour Mills in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Pulm Med. 2018;2018:9521297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9521297.
  4. Mekonnen TH, Dessie A, Tesfaye AH. Respiratory symptoms related to flour dust exposure are significantly high among small and medium scale flour mill workers in Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional survey. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-021-01019-y.
  5. Upadhyay K, Bagepally BS, Balachandar R, Sheth A, Viramgami A. Pulmonary function among flour mill workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21286-6.
  6. Stobnicka A, Górny RL. Exposure to flour dust in the occupational environment. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):241-249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1081764.
  7. Brisman J. Baker's asthma. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59(7):498-502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.7.498.
  8. Page EH, Dowell CH, Mueller CA, Biagini RE, Heederik D. Exposure to flour dust and sensitization among bakery employees. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(12):1225-1232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20893.
  9. Beach J, Galarneau JM, Cherry N. Flour exposure, sensitization and respiratory health among Alberta trainee bakers. Occup Med (Lond). 2022;72(8):559-565. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqac101.
  10. Oo TW, Thandar M, Htun YM, Soe PP, Lwin TZ, Tun KM, et al. Assessment of respiratory dust exposure and lung functions among workers in textile mill (Thamine), Myanmar: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10712-0.
  11. Kenny LC. Developments in workplace aerosol sampling. A review. Analyst. 1996;121(9):1233-1239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/an9962101233.
  12. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Miller MR, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST.
  13. Stanojevic S, Kaminsky DA, Miller MR, Thompson B, Aliverti A, Barjaktarevic I, et al. ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2022;60(1):2101499. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312.
  14. Ghio AJ, Stewart M, Sangani RG, Pavlisko EN, Roggli VL. Cigarette smoking decreases macrophage-dependent clearance to impact the biological effects of occupational and environmental particle exposures. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1558723. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1558723.
  15. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.
  16. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2393.
  17. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
  18. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
  19. Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, Baur X, Hall GL, Culver BH, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(6):1324-1343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312.
  20. Redlich CA, Tarlo SM, Hankinson JL, Townsend MC, Eschenbacher WL, Von Essen SG, et al. Official American Thoracic Society Technical Standards: Spirometry in the Occupational Setting. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(8):983-993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0337ST.
  21. Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ. 2006;332(7549):1080. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080.
  22. Barros AJD, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3:21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21.
  23. Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, et al. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(4):337-350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3.
  24. Arrighi HM, Hertz-Picciotto I. The Evolving Concept of the Healthy Worker Survivor Effect. Epidemiology. 1994;5(2):189-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199403000-00009.
  25. Zou G. A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh090.
  26. Jeebhay MF, Baatjies R. Prevention of baker's asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;20(2):96-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000612.
  27. Meijster T, Warren N, Heederik D, Tielemans E. What is the best strategy to reduce the burden of occupational asthma and allergy in bakers? Occup Environ Med. 2011;68(3):176-182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2009.053611.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy retain the copyright of their work. The journal applies a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which grants the following rights:

  1. Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work, maintaining full control over their intellectual property without restrictions.

  2. Right of First Publication: Authors grant the journal the right of first publication of their work. This ensures that the work is initially published and credited in Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy.

  3. License to Share and Reuse: The work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, allowing others to copy, distribute, remix, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper credit is given to the authors, and any new creations are licensed under the same terms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.