Bridging Gaps: Cross-Sector Collaboration in Improving Sanitation Access in Last-Miles Communities of South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Abstract
ntroduction: According to the Global Burden of Disease study, approximately 775,000 lives were lost prematurely in 2017 due to poor sanitation. In 2020, only 54% of the global population had access to safely managed sanitation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore cross-sector collaboration for improving sanitation access at "last mile" communities in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Barriers to achieving Open Defecation Free (ODF) status were emphasized, with a focus on the dynamics between health centers (puskesmas) and village governments.
Methods: This qualitative case study was conducted with key stakeholders who were directly engaged in the STBM program, such as managers, district government officers, health officers, as well as sub-district, village, and puskesmas heads. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews were used to collect data. Analysis was conducted thematically to determine patterns and obstacles to collaboration.
Results: There was no synergy between puskesmas and village governments in enhancing access to sanitation. Puskesmas operated by modifying the behavior of communities to construct their own latrines, while the village governments operated by providing financial support through village funds. This isolation led to community reliance on outside assistance as well as lowered ODF program effectiveness. FGDs also showed misconceptions among the stakeholders, and external influences on the pathogen spread to water and food sources (e.g., vectors (e.g., flies) spreading pathogens).
Conclusion: The synergy between puskesmas and village governments was a critical obstacle to attaining the ideal level of sanitation access and ODF status in the last-mile communities. Enhancing partnership by considering integrated planning, better communication, and participation of the community is necessary. The study showed that the existence of vectors, such as flies, worsened the sanitation issues. This underscores the significance of integrated and sustainable cross-sector partnerships to enhance access to sanitation and control vectors.
References
World Health Organization - WHO. Sanitasion. 2024; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation
Gupta V, Gonzales HB, Hungwe D, Kanokwan Y, Takahashi F. Understanding global perspectives for the acceptance of community sanitation welfare schemes through a localised qualitative survey in Kho Nagorian, Jaipur, India. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2024;1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65191-1
Malolo R, Kumwenda S, Chidziwisano K, Kambala C, Morse T. Social outcomes of a community-based water, sanitation and hygiene intervention. J water, Sanit Hyg Dev [Internet]. 2021;11(3):483–93. Available from: https://iwaponline.com/washdev/article/11/3/483/80998/Social-outcomes-of-a-community-based-water
USAID. Sanitation: Water and Development Strategy Implementation Brief. Goal Usaid Water Dev Strateg 2013-2018. 2016;(July 2016):12 pp.
Aboah M, Miyittah MK. Estimating global water, sanitation, and hygiene levels and related risks on human health, using global indicators data from 1990 to 2020. J Water Health [Internet]. 2022;20(7):1091–101. Available from: https://iwaponline.com/jwh/article/20/7/1091/88606/Estimating-global-water-sanitation-and-hygiene
IGME) UIAG for CME (UN. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2015. New York; 2015.
Langford M, Bartram J, Roaf V. The Human Right to Sanitation. In: Langford M, Russell AFS, editors. The Human Right to Water: Theory, Practice and Prospects [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 300–44. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/07ABD6F0EC4ACB0F5AD10658BAF03A3D
Gestmann F, Förster M, Mehlhorn H, Sievert K, Messler S, Neuhausen N, et al. Flies as Vectors of Microorganisms Potentially Inducing Severe Diseases in Humans and Animals BT - Arthropods as Vectors of Emerging Diseases. In: Mehlhorn H, editor. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 195–226. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28842-5_9
Mead S. State of the World’s. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO), 2020.
UNICEF & WHO. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: Special focus on inequalities, New York and Geneva: UNICEF and WHO. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/resources/progress-drinking water-sanitation-hygiene-2019/.
Cameron L, Shah M, Olivia S. Impact Evaluation of a Large-Scale Rural Sanitation Project in Indonesia The World Bank Sustainable Development Network Water and Sanitation Program Impact Evaluation Series No. 83 [Internet]. Vol. 83, World Bank Group Open Knowledge Repository. 2013. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10986/13166
Venkataramanan V, Crocker J, Karon A, Bartram J. Community-led total sanitation: A mixed-methods systematic review of evidence and its quality. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(2).
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Monev 5 Pilar STBM [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://link.kemkes.go.id/multi/Links/lists/EMonev5PilarSTBM
Bartram J, Brocklehurst C, Fisher MB, Luyendijk R, Hossain R, Wardlaw T, et al. Global monitoring of water supply and sanitation: History, methods and future challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2014;11(8):8137–65. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/8/8137
Hutton G, Varughese M. The Costs of Meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal Targets on Drinking Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: Summary Report [Internet]. World Bank Group. 2016. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/cfbfaf80-3930-5ffd-a5bf-6ded12a1340e
World Health Organization. National Systems to Support Drinking-Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: Global Status Report 2019. UN-Water global analysis and assessment of sanitation and drinking- water (GLAAS) 2019 report. 2019. 144 p.
Djansena A, Erika K, Santoso B, Pertahanan U, Java W. Cross-Sectoral Strategies for Freshwater and Sanitation in Supporting Sustainable Environmental Resilience. PPSDP Int J Educ [Internet]. 2025;4(2):834–52. Available from: https://ejournal.ppsdp.org/index.php/pijed/article/view/583
Spitters HPEM, Van Oers JAM, Sandu P, Lau CJ, Quanjel M, Dulf D, et al. Developing a policy game intervention to enhance collaboration in public health policymaking in three European countries. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–12.
Van Vooren NJE, Drewes HW, de Weger E, Bongers IMB, Baan CA. Cross-sector collaboration for a healthy living environment—which strategies to implement, why, and in which context? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):1–15.
Steenkamer B, Drewes H, Putters K, van Oers H, Baan C. Reorganizing and integrating public health, health care, social care and wider public services: a theory-based framework for collaborative adaptive health networks to achieve the triple aim. J Heal Serv Res Policy. 2020;25(3):187–201.
Parikh P, Diep L, Hofmann P, Tomei J, Campos LC, Teh TH, et al. Synergies and trade-offs between sanitation and the sustainable development goals. UCL Open Environ. 2021;2.
Mundo W, Manetta P, Fort MP, Sauaia A. A Qualitative Study of Health in All Policies at the Local Level. Inq (United States). 2019;56.
Tooher R, Collins J, Braunack-Mayer A, Burgess T, Skinner SR, O’Keefe M, et al. Intersectoral collaboration to implement schoolbased health programmes: Australian perspectives. Health Promot Int. 2017;32(2):312–21.
JZ S. Inferences about moral character moderate the impact of consequences on blame and praise. Cognition. 2017; 167:201–11.
Parikh, P., Diep, L., Hofmann, P., Tomei, J., Campos, L. C., Teh, T.-H., Mulugetta, Y., Milligan, B., & Lakhanpaul M. Synergies and trade-offs between sanitation and the sustainable development goals. UCL Open Environ. 2021;2(1).
O’Reilly K, Louiss’ E. The toilet tripod: Understanding successful sanitation in rural India. Heal Place [Internet]. 2014; 29:43–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.05.007
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy retain the copyright of their work. The journal applies a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which grants the following rights:
-
Copyright Retention: Authors retain the copyright of their work, maintaining full control over their intellectual property without restrictions.
-
Right of First Publication: Authors grant the journal the right of first publication of their work. This ensures that the work is initially published and credited in Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy.
-
License to Share and Reuse: The work is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, allowing others to copy, distribute, remix, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially, as long as proper credit is given to the authors, and any new creations are licensed under the same terms.
