Correction, Retraction, and Expression of Concern Policy

Correction, Retraction, and Expression of Concern Policy
Promotif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat
Maintaining an accurate, transparent, and trustworthy scholarly record through proportionate post-publication action.
PJKM-CRR-009 Version 1.0 Updated August 2026
Promotif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (PJKM) is committed to correcting the scholarly record when published content is inaccurate, misleading, unreliable, incomplete, or affected by research or publication misconduct.

Post-publication action is intended to protect readers and preserve the integrity of the literature. It is not used merely as a punitive measure. Decisions are based on the nature, seriousness, and effect of the issue, the available evidence, and the need for a clear and durable public record.

Core Principles
Accuracy
The published record should reflect the best available evidence.
Transparency
Notices must explain what changed and why.
Proportionality
The action should match the seriousness and impact of the problem.
Permanence
The original record and linked notices should remain identifiable.
Types of Post-Publication Action
Correction
Used when a limited error affects part of the article but the overall findings and conclusions remain substantially reliable.
Retraction
Used when findings are unreliable, publication is seriously unethical, or the article should not continue to be relied upon.
Expression of Concern
Used when serious concerns exist but the evidence is incomplete, disputed, or still under investigation.
Removal in Exceptional Cases
Used only when continued public display creates a serious legal, privacy, safety, or security risk that cannot be addressed by retraction alone.
Corrections

A correction may be issued when an error or omission affects the article's accuracy, interpretation, attribution, or presentation but does not invalidate the article as a whole.

Incorrect author name or affiliation Minor data or numerical error Incorrect table, figure, or label Omitted acknowledgment or funding detail Reference or citation error Clarification of methods or limitations
Correction format: The journal will normally publish a separate correction notice linked bidirectionally to the original article. The notice should identify the affected article, explain the error, state the correction, and indicate whether conclusions were affected.
Retractions

Retraction may be appropriate when the article is substantially unreliable or when serious ethical or publication misconduct affects the validity or legitimacy of publication.

Unreliable Findings
Major error, fabrication, falsification, inappropriate analysis, or other defects invalidate the findings.
Plagiarism or Redundant Publication
Substantial unattributed copying, duplicate publication, or major undisclosed overlap is confirmed.
Unethical Research
Required ethics approval, consent, participant protection, animal welfare, or legal compliance was absent or materially misrepresented.
Authorship or Peer-Review Manipulation
The publication process was materially compromised by false authorship, fake reviewers, or review manipulation.
Serious Legal or Rights Violation
The article includes unlawful, infringing, defamatory, or seriously privacy-violating material.
Retraction Notice and Article Status
The article will normally remain accessible: Retraction removes an article from the reliable literature, but it does not usually erase the historical record. The article should remain online with a clear retraction watermark or label and a prominent link to the retraction notice.

A retraction notice should identify the article, state who is retracting it, explain the reason in clear and factual language, distinguish honest error from misconduct where possible, avoid defamatory or unsupported statements, and be freely accessible.

Expressions of Concern

PJKM may issue an expression of concern when there is credible evidence of a potentially serious problem but the available information is inconclusive, an institutional investigation is incomplete, parties disagree materially about the evidence, or a final outcome is likely to be delayed.

An expression of concern is temporary and precautionary. It may later be replaced by a correction, retraction, or notice that no further action is required.

Article Removal in Exceptional Circumstances

Complete removal of article content is reserved for exceptional circumstances, such as a binding legal order, severe privacy breach, immediate and substantial risk to public safety, unlawful confidential information, or content whose continued display would create serious harm that cannot be mitigated by correction or retraction.

When content is removed, the bibliographic record should remain available where legally and technically possible, together with a notice explaining why the full text is unavailable.
Post-Publication Review Process
1
Concern Received
The journal receives a correction request, allegation, complaint, institutional notice, or editorial concern.
2
Initial Assessment
The editor assesses credibility, seriousness, urgency, available evidence, and potential risk to readers or participants.
3
Author and Institutional Inquiry
Authors may be asked for explanations, original data, ethics records, permissions, or supporting documents. Institutions or other competent bodies may be contacted when appropriate.
4
Independent Evaluation
The journal may seek additional editorial, methodological, statistical, legal, or ethical advice.
5
Decision and Notice
The editor determines the appropriate action and publishes or updates the linked notice.
Responsibilities
Authors
Notify the journal promptly of significant errors and cooperate honestly with post-publication review.
Editors
Assess concerns fairly, maintain confidentiality, seek evidence, and take proportionate action.
Publisher
Support independent editorial decisions and ensure that notices, metadata, and article status are implemented correctly.
Readers and Complainants
Provide specific, verifiable, and good-faith information when raising a concern.
Author Agreement and Disagreement

PJKM will seek author input where appropriate, but author agreement is not required for a correction, expression of concern, or retraction when the evidence supports editorial action. If authors disagree, the notice may record that disagreement factually.

Metadata and Indexing Updates

Post-publication notices should be assigned persistent identifiers where appropriate, linked to the affected article, and reflected in the article metadata. PJKM may notify Crossref, indexing services, repositories, aggregators, and preservation systems so that the article status is represented accurately across external platforms.

Timeliness and Interim Action

The journal will seek to resolve concerns without unnecessary delay. Complex matters may require institutional investigation or specialist advice. Where readers may be at risk of relying on potentially unreliable findings, PJKM may issue an interim expression of concern while the matter remains unresolved.

Related PJKM Policies
Publication Ethics Plagiarism Policy Data Sharing Policy Article Withdrawal Policy
Standards and Guidance
Policy review: PJKM may revise this policy to reflect changes in publication ethics, metadata practice, legal requirements, and post-publication standards. The policy identifier, version, and last-updated date above identify the current version.
PJKM corrects the literature transparently, retracts unreliable work when necessary, and preserves a clear record of every post-publication action.