PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN KASASI NO. 2296 K/PID.SUS/2024 YANG MENYIMPANGI KETENTUAN PIDANA MINIMUM KHUSUS:

Fahima  Ramadani; Awaliah Awaliah; Hasnawati Hasnawati

doi:10.56338/mlj.v10i1.10657

Fahima Ramadani Universitas Tadulako
Awaliah Awaliah Universitas Tadulako
Hasnawati Hasnawati Universitas Tadulako

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/mlj.v10i1.10657

Keywords: Narkotika, Pertim-bangan Pemidanaan, Pidana Minimum Khu-sus

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the basis of the Supreme Court judges' considerations in the deviation. This study uses a normative legal research method. The results of the study indicate that the Supreme Court corrected the judex facti decision by changing the application of the article from Article 114 paragraph (1) to Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the change in the application of the article by the Supreme Court was based on the failure to fulfill the elements of a sales intermediary due to the absence of relevant witnesses. However, in the aspect of criminalization, the Supreme Court imposed a prison sentence below the special minimum limit without adequate consideration of the reasons for the deviation, while the fine was still imposed according to the provisions of the law. This condition indicates a weak construction of the argumentation for punishment which has the potential to cause disparity in punishment, as well as create uncertainty in the application of the special minimum criminal provisions in judicial practice. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of comprehensive and argumentative considerations by judges in every deviation from the special minimum criminal provisions in order to maintain justice and legal certainty.

References

Andi Intan Purnamasari,Awaliah, Fidyah Faramita Utami. “Criminal Acts Handling: The Concept Of Criminal Law Reform.” Tadulako Master Law Journal 5, no. 1 (2016): 122–35.https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=CRIMINAL+ACTS+HANDLING%3A+THE+CONCEPT+OF+CRIMINAL+LAW+REFORM&btnG=.
Andi Lulu Isvany et al. “Peninjauan Hukum Pidana Narkotika Di Indonesia: Tantangan, Dampak, Dan Upaya Melindungi Generasi Muda.” Indonesia Journal of Legality of Law 7, no. 1 (2024): 109–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v7i1.5463.
Arifin, Andi. “Peran Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Indonesia.” IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 6–10. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/610555-peran-hakim-dalam-mewujudkan-negara-huku-21482532.pdf.
Dianti, Flora. Hukum Pembuktian Pidana Di Indonesia: Perpandingan HIR Dan KUHAP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2024.
Febriyanti Silaen dan Syawal Amry Siregar. “Hubungan Kebijakan Kriminal Dengan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Darma Agung 28, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v28i1.455.
Gulo, Nimerodi, and Cornelius Dikae Zolohefona Gulo. “Timbulnya Keyakinan Hakim Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Perkara Pidana Di Peradilan Indonesia.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8115–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1672.
Jonaedi Efendi dan Prasetijo Rijadi. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.
Mia Ramadani. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakimyang Tidak Lengkap (Onvoldoende Gemotiveerd) Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Di Bawah Ancaman Pidana Minimal Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 46/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn Mrn).” Jurist Argumentum: Pemikiran Intelektual Hukum 3, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35308/jjm.v3i2.14875.
Nanda Nisa Iffatul Hanan, Nurul Amalia, Ahmad Muti. “Tinjauan Yuridis Dan Hukum Islam Mengenai Putusan Dibawah Pidana Minimum Khusus Pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan No. 504/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Cbi).” Jurnal Inovasi Hukum 6, no. 1 (2025). https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jih/article/view/1022.
Rendra Yoki Pardede, Alvi Syahrin, Mohammad Ekaputra, Mahmud Mulyadi. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Di Bawah Ancaman Pidana Minimum Khusus Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 775K/Pid.Sus/2020.” Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 3 (2022): 144–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v2i3.31.
Sofyan, Andi Muhammad, Nur Azisa. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Prenada Media, 2023.
Sulis Angrayni Siagian. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Putusan Hakim Yang Menyimpang Dari Sanksi Pidana Minimum Dalam Perkara Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 125/Pid. Sus/2024/PN/Bir).” Karimah Tauhid 4, no. 8 (2025): 6145–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v4i8.20483.
Vivi Nur Qalbi, Andi Nurul Isnawidiawinarti Achmad, Keyu Zulkarnain Arif. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Narkotika Melalui Restorative Justice: Studi Kasus Di Kejaksaan Tinggi Sulawesi Tengah.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 7 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.2005.
Wijayanti Puspita Dewi. “Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Atas Tindak Pidana Narkotika Oleh Hakim Di Bawah Ketentuan Minimum Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika.” Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus¬ 2, no. 2 (2019): 55. https://share.google/S2PExWDr5hO88CzYa.