Optimization of Water Guarantee for Making Face Cleaning Soap

  • Yulia Vera Undergraduate Pharmacy Study Program health faculty Aufa Royhan University In Padangsidimpuan City
  • Susi Yanti Undergraduate Pharmacy Study Program health faculty Aufa Royhan University In Padangsidimpuan City
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/jphp.v2i1.3731
Keywords: Guava Water, Facial Cleansing Soap, Saponification

Abstract

Facial cleansers generally have good cleaning power. Facial cleansing soap is also very necessary to keep facial skin clean and healthy. One of the natural ingredients that can help the cleaning process is guava leaf water. Guava leaf water contains several secondary metabolites, such as tannins, triterpenoids, glycosides and flavonoids. In addition, the selection of dosage forms also affects the cleaning power of a cleaning soap. Therefore, in this study, a cleaning soap was made from guava leaf water and a physical evaluation of the soap was carried out in accordance with the specifications and requirements specified. The principle of the saponification reaction is the reaction between oil and KOH/NaOH. The facial cleansing soap made in this study is solid soap. Based on the quality test results, solid leri soap has a pH of 10.3, the saponification rate is 32 water content 34 water content 34% and respondent tests on the aroma and foam aspects which show good enough results so that guava water treatment can be an alternative solution to prevent the use of water. Facial cleanser that contains harmful chemicals.

References

1. Abeliotis K, Candan C, Amberg C, Ferri A, Osset M, Owens J, et al. Impact of water hardness on consumers’ perception of laundry washing result in five European countries. Int J Consum Stud. 2015;39(1):60–6.
2. Naseer S, Hussain S, Naeem N, Pervaiz M, Rahman M. The phytochemistry and medicinal value of Psidium guajava (guava). Clin Phytoscience. 2018;4(1):1–8.
3. Lorent JH, Quetin-Leclercq J, Mingeot-Leclercq M-P. The amphiphilic nature of saponins and their effects on artificial and biological membranes and potential consequences for red blood and cancer cells. Org Biomol Chem. 2014;12(44):8803–22.
4. Dong S, Yang X, Zhao L, Zhang F, Hou Z, Xue P. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action saponins from Chenopodium quinoa Willd. husks against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;149:112350.
5. Naviglio D, Scarano P, Ciaravolo M, Gallo M. Rapid Solid-Liquid Dynamic Extraction (RSLDE): A powerful and greener alternative to the latest solid-liquid extraction techniques. Foods. 2019;8(7):245.
6. Alexander A, Khichariya A, Gupta S, Patel RJ, Giri TK, Tripathi DK. Recent expansions in an emergent novel drug delivery technology: Emulgel. J Control Release. 2013;171(2):122–32.
7. Georgiannakis G, Houstis C, Kapidakis S, Karavassili M, Labrinidis A, Marazakis M, et al. Description of the adaptive resource management problem, cost functions and performance objectives. ESPRIT. 1994;3:P8144.
Published
2022-03-25
How to Cite
Yulia Vera, & Susi Yanti. (2022). Optimization of Water Guarantee for Making Face Cleaning Soap . Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy, 2(1), 20-23. https://doi.org/10.56338/jphp.v2i1.3731
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1: MARCH 2022
Section
Articles

Journal of Public Health and Pharmacy has CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work. Authors who publish with this journal retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.