Resilience as a Socially Embedded Process in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study

  • Herdhana Suwartono Postgraduate Doctoral Program Students, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia. Medical School, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Indonesia
  • Juraid Abdul Latief Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Achmad Herman Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ryman Napirah Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Tadulako, Indonesia
Keywords: Cervical Cancer, Resilience, Psychosocial Oncology, Qualitative Research, Spirituality, Family Support, LMICs

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer continues to pose significant health and psychosocial challenges in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to explore how women with cervical cancer and their caregivers construct resilience in the face of illness, focusing on the roles of emotional, informational, and spiritual supports. By examining these dimensions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of resilience as a socially embedded process shaped by cultural frameworks and clinical interactions.

Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed, drawing on in-depth interviews with women diagnosed with cervical cancer and one caregiver at a referral hospital in Indonesia. Informants were selected purposively to capture diverse illness trajectories, and thematic analysis was applied to verbatim transcripts. Analytical rigor was ensured through triangulation, iterative coding, and interpretive synthesis.

Results: Findings indicate that resilience is not a fixed personal trait but a negotiated and dynamic process. Emotional reassurance from family and colleagues, clear and compassionate communication by clinicians, and the grounding of experiences in spirituality and religious practices all facilitated adaptation and treatment adherence. At the same time, resilience revealed ambivalence: moralized expectations of being a “good patient” encouraged compliance but risked silencing distress, while some informants engaged in resistance through treatment hesitation or refusal. Interpreting these findings through subjectivation, psychological, and ecological lenses illustrates that resilience is discursively produced, individually enacted, and structurally conditioned.

Conclusion: This study concludes that resilience in cervical cancer care is best understood as a culturally embedded and multi-layered phenomenon. Its implications underscore the need for context-sensitive psychosocial oncology practices that integrate family support, culturally grounded spiritual care, and dialogic communication. By situating Indonesian experiences within broader international debates, the research contributes new insights to global psycho-oncology scholarship and highlights avenues for future inquiry, including longitudinal research and the development of culturally validated assessment tools.

References

1. Yuan R, Ren F, Xie Y, Li K, Tong Z. The global, regional, and national burdens of cervical cancer attributable to smoking from 1990 to 2019: population-based study. JMIR Public Heal Surveill. 2022;8(12):e40657.
2. Wan Z, Zhao J, Xu L, Sun P, Shuai P, Li K, et al. Global and regional estimates of cervical cancer burden associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection from 1990 to 2019. J Med Virol. 2023;95(6):e28891.
3. Liu Y, Shi W, Mubarik S, Wang F. Assessment of secular trends of three major gynecologic cancers burden and attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019: an age period cohort analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1349.
4. Momenimovahed Z, Mazidimoradi A, Maroofi P, Allahqoli L, Salehiniya H, Alkatout I. Global, regional and national burden, incidence, and mortality of cervical cancer. Cancer Rep. 2023;6(3):e1756.
5. Song Y, Cui F, Wang Z, He X, Chu Y. Analyzing Global and Regional Cervical Cancer Burden from Unsafe Sex: 1990-2019 Trend Study. 2023;
6. Hussain M, Ahmad K. Spirituality and Social Support as Predictors of Resilience among Elderly Cancer Patients’ Informal Caregivers in Punjab, Pakistan. J Manag Pract Humanit Soc Sci. 2021;5(6):27–35.
7. de Paula Silva C, Alonso Reis AP. SPIRITUAL/RELIGIOUS SUPPORT FOR NURSING IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST CANCER: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW. Rev Pesqui Cuid é Fundam. 2024;16(1).
8. Chong ASS, Ahmad M Bin, Alias H, Iqbal Hussain RB, Lateh A Bin, Chan CMH. Spiritual coping among families of children with cancer: a qualitative study. Asia Pacific J Public Heal. 2023;35(6–7):408–12.
9. Cruz CJBC Dela, Girlie EA. Social support, self-efficacy, and spirituality of adolescents: A structural equation model of their personal resilience during a pandemic. Am J Multidiscip Res Innov. 2022;1(4):180–98.
10. Tung Y, Lin Y. The Effects of Family Characteristics, Emotional Expression and Early Social Work Intervention on Illness Adaptation Among Children with Cancer and Their Parents. 2025;
11. Yusuf A, Laksono AD. The Determinant of Coping Mechanisms among Breast Cancer Patients in Sidoarjo Regency, Indonesia. Medico-Legal Updat. 2021;21(1).
12. Hutahaean BSH, Stutterheim SE, Jonas KJ. Religion, Faith, and Spirituality as Barriers and Facilitators to Antiretroviral Therapy Initiation Among People with HIV in Indonesia. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2025;39(4):160–72.
13. Adnan SDM, Zur Raffar INAH, Dahalan NNN, Kadir NAA, Nasir MFM, Jalani H. The Psychological Well-Being Practices from Islamic Perspective in Families During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Glob Bus Manag Res. 2024;16(2s):743–57.
14. Mulyono WA, Ekowati W. Validation of Indonesian brief measurement of religious coping (Brief R Cope BI). J Keperawatan Soedirman. 2023;18(1):52–7.
15. Harbali SM, Koç Z. Psychosocial problems in relation to spiritual orientation and religious coping among oncology Muslim patients. Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(2):120–31.
16. Almaraz D, Saiz J, Moreno Martín F, Sánchez-Iglesias I, Molina AJ, Goldsby TL, et al. Religiosity, emotions and health: the role of trust/mistrust in god in people affected by cancer. In: Healthcare. MDPI; 2022. p. 1138.
17. Batra M, Gallagher C, Yuen E, White VM, Erbas B, Wilson C. Comparing spiritual wellbeing and illness perceptions between cancer patients from culturally and linguistically diverse and those from mainstream backgrounds in Australia. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(12):823.
18. Waliyanti E, Primastuti HI. Family support: A caregiver experience in caring for nasopharynx cancer patients in yogyakarta. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9(T4):245–52.
19. Humbelina OGM, Carlos CHJ, Carolina RGD. Experiences Of Nursing Professionals In The Care Of Pediatric Patients With Oncological Diseases. J Pharm Negat Results. 2022;13.
20. Mooy YC, Mage MYC, Anakaka DL. Dynamics of Social Support and Self-Acceptance in the Elderly in Class III Ba’a Rote Ndao Correctional Institution. J Heal Behav Sci. 2024;6(3):227–40.
21. Jafer D, Arif S, Ahmed F, Victor G. Spiritual Needs of Patients with End-stage Cancer; an Exploratory Description through Nurses’ Lens. Ann King Edward Med Univ. 2024;30(2):136–44.
22. Lee A, Wong Y, Neo XS. Coping Mechanisms Among Patients with Terminal Illnesses. KMAN Couns Psychol Nexus. 2024;2(1):91–7.
23. Kruger D, Samuels N, Lacey J, Keshet Y, Gressel O, Dodiuk-Gad RP, et al. Exploring a multi-disciplinary model of supportive cancer care for monoclonal antibody treatment-related dermatological symptoms. Support Care Cancer. 2023;31(3):185.
24. Shanbhag N, Bin Sumaida A, Gurashi Ibrahim H, Al-Harassi A, Al-Dabbous T, Javed Z, et al. Heart of Care: Embracing Grief and Growth in Oncology and Palliative Medicine. F1000Research. 2024;13:1068.
25. Murphy JM, Chin ED, Westlake CA, Asselin M, Brisbois MD. Pediatric hematology/oncology nurse spirituality, stress, coping, spiritual well-being, and intent to leave: a mixed-method study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2021;38(6):349–63.
26. Wondimagegnehu A, Abebe W, Hirpa S, Kantelhardt EJ, Addissie A, Zebrack B, et al. Availability and utilization of psychosocial services for breast cancer patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a mixed method study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2023;2023(1):5543335.
27. Salm S, Houwaart S, Cecon-Stabel N, Dresen A, Pfaff H, Scholten N, et al. Integrating one-to-one peer support into psycho-oncological care in Germany: multi-perspective, mixed-methods evaluation of the isPO onco-guide service. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(12):10399–422.
28. Götz A, Kröner A, Jenewein J, Spirig R. Evaluation of distress management in inpatients with cancer by means of the distress thermometer: A mixed methods approach. Palliat Support Care. 2024;22(4):734–41.
29. Wentzel DL, Collins A, Brysiewicz P. An intervention to manage compassion fatigue in oncology nurses in Durban, South Africa. Heal SA Gesondheid. 2023;28:1–7.
30. Shih Y, Wang C, Ali A, Huang X, Lu Q. Oncology nurses’ communication practices and challenges towards advance care planning: a sequential explanatory mixed?method study. J Adv Nurs. 2025;81(2):1082–94.
31. Signorelli C, Høeg BL, Asuzu C, Centeno I, Estapé T, Fisher P, et al. International survey of psychosocial care for cancer survivors in low-/middle-and high-income countries: Current practices, barriers, and facilitators to care. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024;10:e2300418.
32. Du S, Zhou Z, Wang C, Luan Z, Wu N, Chen Y, et al. Spiritual needs of women with breast cancer: A structural equation model. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024;71:102647.
33. Henderson V, Tossas?Milligan K, Martinez E, Williams B, Torres P, Mannan N, et al. Implementation of an integrated framework for a breast cancer screening and navigation program for women from underresourced communities. Cancer. 2020;126:2481–93.
34. WANG W, XU M, XING Z, LU FEI, ALISWAG EG, WU J. Exploring the barriers and enablers of the self-management ability in colorectal cancer patients with enterostomy: a qualitative study based on social ecological model. 2023;
35. George LS, Saraiya B, Mohile S, Muha E, Sarwar S, Duberstein PR. Obliged to fight? Patient moral processes in the face of poor prognosis cancer. Heal Psychol. 2024;
Published
2025-10-20
How to Cite
Herdhana Suwartono, Juraid Abdul Latief, Achmad Herman, & Muhammad Ryman Napirah. (2025). Resilience as a Socially Embedded Process in Cervical Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study . Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI), 8(10), 1241-1252. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v8i10.8667