Horizon of Public Health Sciences (HoPHS) maintains a reviewer pool of scholars who may be invited to provide independent, confidential, and constructive peer review according to manuscript subject, methodological requirements, availability, and absence of relevant conflicts of interest.

Reviewer-pool transparency: inclusion on this page identifies a scholar who may support the HoPHS peer-review process. It does not disclose or imply that the person reviewed any particular manuscript, participated in every issue, or holds editorial decision-making authority. Manuscript-specific reviewer assignments remain confidential under the journal's double-blind peer-review policy.

International reviewer participation broadens disciplinary and geographic perspectives available to the journal when selecting manuscript-specific peer reviewers.

Reviewer invitations are matched to the scientific and methodological requirements of manuscripts across the HoPHS scope. The journal's principal scientific domains are:

A scholar may appear in both the HoPHS Editorial Board and Reviewer Pool where appropriate. When such a person is invited as a reviewer, the same confidentiality, conflict-of-interest, independence, and manuscript-specific suitability requirements apply. Reviewer recommendations remain advisory; final editorial decisions are made by the authorised editor.

Reviewer information should be reviewed periodically and updated when institutional affiliations, availability, expertise, or participation status changes. Listing on this page does not disclose manuscript-specific review history.