The Gambaran Tingkat Distress Dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Memengaruhi Pada Perawat Di RSUD X Tembilahan Tahun 2022: Validasi Dan Reliabilitas Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III

The Description And Factors Associated With Distress Level Among Nurse In RSUD X Tembilahan Year 2022: Validation And Reliability Of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III

  • Warda Yussy Rha Magister Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia
  • Mila Tejamaya Departemen Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: Distres, Penilaian Risiko Psikososial, Tes Penilaian Diri Subyektif, Perawat, Rumah Sakit


Nursing is one of the stressful professions. Stress emerged on nurses due to various factors, They have affected nurses in the form of tiredness, harsh behavior, anxiety, increase of blood pressure, lack of self-confidence, lack of job satisfaction, decrease in efficiency, etc. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) is one of a few research-based instruments that have been developed for use at workplaces as well as for research purposes. The instrument is internationally recognized as a risk assessment tool by both the International Labour Organization and the World Health Organization and is used in workplace surveys worldwide for work environment development and follow-up of organizational changes. This study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) on Nurse at RSUD X. The study design is cross-sectional. Determination of the sample of this study using simple random sampling method of Nurse in RSUD X, The questionnaire was based on COPSOQ III scales, Validity and Reliability tests using Pearson Product Moment and Cronbach's alpha.


1. Bakker, A., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. Burnout and work engagement: the JD-R Approach.Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav, 2014; 389-411.
2. Ball JE, Murrells T, Rafferty AM, Morrow E, Griffiths P. 'Care left undone' during nursing shifts: associations with workload and perceived quality of care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(2):116-125.
3. Bliese, P.D.; Jex, S.M. Incorporating multiple levels of analysis into occupational stress research. Work Stress. 1999, 13, 1–6.
4. Berthelsen H, Hakanen JJ, Westerlund H. Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A validation study using the Job Demand- Resources model. PLoS ONE. 2014; 13(4)
5. Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Bergström G, Burr H. Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3179; doi:10.3390/ijerph17093179
6. Chou, L. P., Li, C., & Hu, S. Job Stress and burnout in Hospital employees : Comparisons of different medical professions : in a regional hospital in Taiwan. British Medical Journal Open.2014.
7. COPSOQ International Network. COPSOQ III - Guidelines and questionnaire. 2020
8. Dewi, Dian ANN. Modul Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas. 2018
9. EA, C. Effect of Ghanaian nurses’ mental stress on their job satisfaction: the role of workload and time pressure. Ghana: University of Ghana.2015
10. Gholamzadeh, S., Sharif, F. & Rad, F.D.,. Sources of occupational stress and coping strategies among nurses who work in Admission and Emergency Departments of Hospitals related to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 2011; 16(1), pp.41–46.
11. Gong, Y. et al.. Prevalence of depressive symptoms and work-related risk factors among nurses in public hospitals in southern China: A cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports,2014; 4, p.7109.
12. Nübling, M.; Vomstein, M.; Haug, A.; Lincke, H. Können psychosoziale Arbeitsbelastungen in einer job-exposure-matrix abgeschätzt werden? Das Gesundheitswesen. 2017, 79, V231.
13. Kemenkes RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia tahun 2020. Jakarta : Kemenkes RI. 2021
14. Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire±a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005; 31:438±449. PMID: 16425585
15. PPNI. PKB Perawat Indonesia Edisi 2016. 2016.
16. Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., & Gefen, D. Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2004;13, 380-427.
17. Streiner DL. Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. 2003;80(1):99–103.
18. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabeta. 2017
Original Articles