Analysis of the Legality of the Kris (Standard Inpatient Class) System from the Perspective of Health Administration Law

  • Yudhi Hertanto Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Anna Veronica Pont Poltekes Kemenkes Palu
  • Johannes Triestanto Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Bandung
  • Habibi Universitas Muhammadiyah Mahakarya Aceh
  • Mohamad Fadli Dg Patompo Poltekes Kemenkes Palu
Keywords: KRIS, legality, health administrative law, BPJS Kesehatan, National Health Insurance

Abstract

The Standard Inpatient Class (KRIS) policy represents a significant reform in Indonesia’s national health service system, as stipulated in Presidential Regulation Number 59 of 2024, which replaces the former inpatient class system (Classes 1, 2, and 3) under the National Health Insurance (JKN) program administered by BPJS Kesehatan. The introduction of KRIS is intended to promote principles of equity, equal access, and non-discrimination in health services, while also streamlining the administrative structure of inpatient care in hospitals. This article aims to examine the legal validity of the KRIS system from the perspective of health administrative law, focusing on its legal foundation, governmental administrative authority, implementation mechanisms within healthcare facilities, and legal protection for both patients and hospitals. This study employs a normative juridical approach using library-based research on relevant legislation and national academic journals. The analysis is conducted by examining legal norms governing KRIS and their implications for health administration governance. The findings indicate that, from a normative standpoint, the KRIS system possesses a strong and legitimate legal basis as a state administrative policy in the health sector. Nevertheless, its practical implementation faces several challenges, including hospital infrastructure readiness, funding limitations, disparities in the capacity of healthcare facilities across regions, and potential administrative issues related to supervision and compliance enforcement. Furthermore, stronger technical regulations and more effective oversight mechanisms are required to ensure that the objectives of KRIS particularly legal protection and equal service provision for JKN participants are fully realized. Therefore, policy synchronization, reinforcement of governmental roles, and enhancement of healthcare facility capacity are essential factors for the successful implementation of the KRIS system in Indonesia.

References

Fakih, M., & Kasmawati, K. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Peserta BPJS Kesehatan dalam Pelayanan kesehatan di rumah sakit. Pactum Law Journal, 1(02), 164-169.

Fauzi, M. R., Saimi, S., & Fathoni, F. (2024). Tantangan dan solusi administrasi kesehatan di era digital (tinjauan literature review atas implementasi teknologi). AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(01), 1093-1103.

Isnaini, E. (2017). Tinjauan yuridis normatif perjudian online menurut hukum positif di indonesia. Jurnal independent, 5(1), 23-32.

Kartika, D., & Sewu, P. L. S. (2016). Pelayanan kesehatan tradisional dan perlindungan hukum bagi pasien. SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan, 2(1), 1-16.

Lestari, R. D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pasien dalam Telemedicine. Jurnal Cakrawala Informasi, 1(2), 51-65.

Malik, A. A. (2019). Implementasi kebijakan diskresi pada pelayanan kesehatan badan penyelenggara jaminan kesehatan (bpjs). Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Sandi Husada, 8(1), 1-8.

Mujiburohman, D. A. (2017). Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara.

Mundzir, M. I. M., Nasrudin, A. M., & Alwi, M. K. (2024). Analisis Persepsi Peserta JKN dan SMF Tentang Kebijakan Kelas Rawat Inap Standar (KRIS) Pada Program JKN Di Rumah Sakit Ibnu Sina YW-UMI Makassar. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 8886-8897.

Putra, R. E. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Manfaat Hukum Pengaturan Kamar Rawat Inap Standar (Kris) Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kesehatan (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).

Putri, S. H., Windraji, P., & Purnomo, B. (2025). Tinjauan Hukum Perjanjian Kerjasama Antara Rumah Sakit dan Perusahaan Asuransi Kesehatan. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(10), 11558-11564.

Rifa’i, I. J., Purwoto, A., Ramadhani, M., Rusydi, M. T., Harahap, N. K., Mardiyanto, I., ... & Surasa, A. (2023). Metodologi penelitian hukum. Sada Kurnia Pustaka.

Rifni Irma, S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional Setelah Diberlakukannya Sistem Kelas Rawat Inap Standar (Kris) Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 59 Tahun 2024 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Lampung).

Sulaiman, A., & Djalaluddin, N. A. (2025). Kesiapan Rumah Sakit Dalam Rencana Penerapan Kelas Rawat Inap Standar Bpjs Kesehatan (Studi Kasus Rsup Dr. Tadjuddin Chalid Makassar). Journal of Public Health Science, 2(2), 339-248.

Thabrany, H. (2014). Jaminan kesehatan nasional. Rajawali Pers.

Tjandra, W. R. (2021). Hukum administrasi negara. Sinar Grafika.

Widjaja, G., Yustanti, D. E., Sijabat, H. H., & Dhanudibroto, H. (2025). Evaluasi Implementasi Kebijakan Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) dalam Meningkatkan Akses Layanan Kesehatan Masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Kesehatan, 3(2), 177-188.

Published
2026-01-30
How to Cite
Yudhi Hertanto, Anna Veronica Pont, Johannes Triestanto, Habibi, & Mohamad Fadli Dg Patompo. (2026). Analysis of the Legality of the Kris (Standard Inpatient Class) System from the Perspective of Health Administration Law. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 8(1), 891~897. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v8i1.9244
Section
Articles