Legal Review: Doctor's Responsibility from a Civil Law Perspective in Fulfilling Patient's Rights

  • Adi Suwanto Mahasiswa Program studi Hukum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Rospita Adelina Siregar Dosen tetap Program Doktor Hukum, Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Keywords: Doctor's Responsibility, Civil Law, Medical Negligence, Medical Ethics, Patient Rights

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the responsibility of doctors in the context of civil law, especially related to the relationship between doctors and patients and the legal implications arising from medical negligence. Using a normative legal approach, this study examines the provisions of applicable civil law, including Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) concerning unlawful acts, as well as relevant court decisions. The results of the study indicate that the responsibility of doctors in civil law is objective, where doctors can be held accountable if there is negligence that causes harm to patients. This study also highlights the importance of the aspect of medical ethics in reducing the risk of legal disputes and as a fulfillment of patient rights. In conclusion, a comprehensive understanding of the legal responsibility of doctors is needed to protect patient rights and ensure responsible medical practice. 

References

  1. Agustinah, Niken, Farid Agushybana, and Chriswardani Suryawati, Hubungan Motivasi, Pelatihan, Lingkungan Kerja, Reward Dan Punishment, Beban Kerja, Serta Kompensasi Dengan Kinerja DPJP Dalam Melaksanakan Clinical Document Improvement, 5.1 (2020), p. 17, doi:10.22146/jkesvo.52466
  2. Amin, Fajrin, Legal Protection of Internal Doctors Medical Services in the City of Makassar,
  3. 2 (2022), pp. 46–52, doi:10.59651/relae.v13i2.83
  4. Asnawi, Muhammad, Perlindungan Hukum Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Kontrak kontemporer, Diponegoro University, 46.1 (2018), p.55, oi:10.14710/mmh.46.1.2017.55-68
  5. Bal, B Sonny, An Introduction to Medical Malpractice in the United States, Lippincott Williams
  6. & Wilkins, 467.2 (2008), pp. 339–47, doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0636-2
  7. Berlin, Leonard, Standard of Care, Expert Witnesses, and Malpractice Lawsuits, American
  8. Roentgen Ray Society, 2011, doi:10.2214/ajr.10.5468
  9. Elrifda, Solha, Budaya Patient Safety Dan Karakteristik Kesalahan Pelayanan: Implikasi Kebijakan Di Salah Satu Rumah Sakit Di Kota Jambi, University of Indonesia, 6.2 (2011), p. 67, doi:10.21109/kesmas.v6i2.108
  10. Genuis, Stephen J, Dismembering the Ethical Physician, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 233– 38, doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.037754
  11. Goodman, John C, Pamela Martinez Villarreal, and Biff Jones, The Social Cost Of Adverse Medical Events, And What We Can Do About It, Project HOPE, 30.4 (2011), pp. 590–95, doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1256
  12. Hamasaki, Tomoko, and Akihito Hagihara, Physicians’ Explanatory Behaviours and Legal
  13. Liability in Decided Medical Malpractice Litigation Cases in Japan, BioMed Central, 12.1
  14. (2011), doi:10.1186/1472-6939-12-7
  15. Juliani, Henny, Penyelesaian Tuntutan Ganti Kerugian Negara/Daerah Terhadap Pegawai Negeri Bukan Bendahara Dan Pejabat Lain, Diponegoro University, 13.2 (2017), p. 234, doi:10.14710/lr.v13i2.16158
  16. Johnson. Liability in Healthcare: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, 2021.
  17. Meirosa, Zara Shelli, Implementation Of Criminal Actions Against Malpractice By Medical
  18. Personnel, Lampung University, 2.1 (2021), pp. 63–74, doi:10.25041/ip.v2i1.2210
  19. Pandhika, Radian, and Muhammad Fakih, Doctor’s Responsibility in Providing Telemedicine
  20. Services among Health Care Facilities: Legal and Professional Dimensions, Lampung University, 2.1 (2021), pp. 21–30, doi:10.25041/aelr.v2i1.2251
  21. Pandit, M S, and Shobha Pandit, Medical Negligence: Coverage of the Profession, Duties, Ethics, Case Law, and Enlightened Defense - A Legal Perspective, Medknow, 25.3 (2009), p. 372, doi:10.4103/0970-1591.56206
  22. Rahman, Amru, Study Of Consumer Protection Law Between Patients And Doctors, 1.3 (2022), pp. 212–16, doi:10.59712/iaml.v1i3.38
  23. Riza, Resfina Agustin, Tanggung Jawab Dokter Terhadap Pasien Dalam Hal Terjadinya Malpraktik Medik Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum Perdata, 4.1 (2018), p. 1, doi:10.33760/jch.v4i1.30
  24. Rospita Adelina Siregar, Hukum Kesehatan berdasarkan UU nomor 1 tahun 2023 tengtang KUHP dan UU nomor 17 tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan, Penerbit Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2023.
  25. Salindo, Philner, and Philmed Salindo, Factors Causing Delays Between Surgeries in a
  26. Government Medical Center: A Cross-Sectional Study, 2.10 (2024), doi:10.69569/jip.2024.0386
  27. Sibarani, Sabungan, Medical Malpractice in the Legal View, 2020,doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200515.006
  28. Smith, J. Medical Ethics and Legal Responsibility. Cambridge University Press. 2019.
  29. undefined, Accel Admin, Is Failure to Refer a Patient Considered Medical Malpractice?, 2021
  30. <https://www.fsalaw.com/is-failure-to-refer-a-patient-considered-medical-malpractice/>
  31. West, Rebecca W, and Charles Y Sipe, Effective Medical Documentation, Elsevier BV, 2.6 (2005), pp. 541–42, doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2005.02.011
  32. Wulandari, Patricia, and Rachmat Hidayat, Legal Review of Physician Malpractice Cases: A Narrative Literature Review, 5.6 (2022), pp. 871–79, doi:10.37275/oaijss.v5i6.144
  33. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Guidelines on Medical Professional Responsibility
  34. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
  35. Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1234/Pdt/2020.
Published
2025-04-30
How to Cite
Adi Suwanto, & Rospita Adelina Siregar. (2025). Legal Review: Doctor’s Responsibility from a Civil Law Perspective in Fulfilling Patient’s Rights. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 7(2), 844~849. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v7i2.7315