The Danger of Drugs for Adolescent Development in the Perspective of Law No. 35 of 2009
Abstract
The latent danger of drugs is a big enemy for all humanity, and this is because the impact resulting from their misuse has a fatal effect on anyone who uses them. Today's drug circulation has penetrated among teenagers as a vital part of the nation's generation, the tendency of the dangers of drugs to development among teenagers certainly has a lot of effects on the situation and conditions of the social climate among the community, considering the most urgent thing when discussing adolescent development is how the substance of the younger generation a nation that the dangers of drug abuse have invaded. The enactment of Law Number 35 of 2009 certainly brings fresh air for law enforcement elements in Indonesia, but not for those addicted to drug abuse. The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach, namely by conducting research based on legal/reference materials by examining the theories and concepts of these legal materials, which are related to the legal principles of statutory regulations, invitations associated with this writing/research.
References
2. Sitorus W, Zahra PL. THE RISK OF DRUGS ABUSE IN ADOLESCENT REVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL, GENDER, MORAL AND RELIGIOUS ROLES.
3. Saridewi W. COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED NATIONS OFFICEON DRUGS AND CRIME WITH THE NATIONAL NARCOTICS AGENCY IN MANAGING DRUGS TRAFFICKING IN INDONESIA. PERPUSTAKAAN; 2017.
4. Ridha M. CRIMINAL SANCTIONS AGAINST DRUG DRUGS IN LAW NO 35 YEAR 2009 REGARDING NARCOTICS IN ISLAMIC LAW PERSPECTIVE. 2018;
5. Maysarah M. Fulfillment of Human Rights in the Implementation of Rehabilitation Based on Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. SOSEK J Sos dan Ekon. 2020;1(1):52–61.
6. Winanti A. REHABILITATION EFFORT AGAINST DRUG ADMINISTRATION IN CRIMINAL LAW PERSPECTIVE. ADIL J Huk. 2019;10(1).
7. Adhyaksa FWP. Implementation of Article 54 of Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Against the Prosecution of Narcotics Criminal Acts (Study at the Semarang City District Attorney). Kumpul J Mhs Fak Huk. 2017;
8. Nggilu NM, Ismail DE, Tome AH. PREVENTION AND COUNTERMEASURES OF NARCOTICS, PSYCHOTROPICS AND OTHER ADDICTIVE (DRUGS) SUBSTANCES THROUGH GORONTALO LOCAL WISDOM APPROACH.
9. Prasetya DD. Legal Protection Against Perpetrators and Victims of Narcotics Abuse. 2017;1–17.
10. Suisno S. Juridical Review of Narcotics Crime Intermediaries According to Law Number 35 Year 2009. J Indep. 2017;5(2):69–80.
11. Partodiharjo S. Get to know drugs and fight their abuse. Jakarta: Erlangga. 2010;
12. Siregar SA, Siahaan AY, Purba MTK. THE DEATH PENALTY POLICY AGAINST DRUG CONTENT IN INDONESIA REVIEW OF HUMAN RIGHTS. J RECTUM Juridical Case Handling Crime. 2021;3(2):152–63.
13. Budiyarto B. Optimization of Disclosure of Drug Cases in the Legal Area of the Boyolali Police (Case Study of Disclosure of the Circulation of Shabu-Shabu Drugs in the Legal Area of the Boyolali Police). J Bedah Huk. 2017;1(1).
14. Iwanda MS, Maysarah M, Rangkuti S, Hasibuan RL. EXPLANATION OF THE NARCOTIC LAW No. 35 YEAR 2009 HAZARDS AND HANDLING IN THE VILLAGE OF TP. TANJUNG PURA HORSE. RESWARA J Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2020;1(2):114–21.
15. Priyo W. REHABILITATION POLICY AGAINST DRUG USERS BASED ON LAW NUMBER 35 YEAR 2009 REGARDING NARCOTICS. Universitas Pancasakti Tegal; 2019.
16. Suyatna U. Evaluation of narcotics policy in 34 provinces in Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora. 2018;20(2):168–76.
