The Effect Oof Work Supervision and Safety Motivation on Workers’ Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Procedures at Pt Pln Nusa Daya Gorontalo Service Unit

Authors

  • Selawati Usman Undergraduate Program in Public Health, Faculty of Sports and Health, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Herlina Jusuf Undergraduate Program in Public Health, Faculty of Sports and Health, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Putri Ayuningtias Mahdang Undergraduate Program in Public Health, Faculty of Sports and Health, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v8i3.11334

Keywords:

Work Supervision, Safety Motivation, Workers’ Compliance, Occupational Safety and Health, Technical Services

Abstract

Workers’ compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) procedures is an important aspect of preventing occupational accidents, particularly in the electricity sector, which involves high levels of occupational risk. Workers’ compliance may be influenced by external factors, such as work supervision, and internal factors, such as safety motivation. This study aimed to analyze the effect of work supervision and safety motivation on workers’ compliance with OSH procedures at PT PLN Nusa Daya Gorontalo Service Unit. This study employed a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional design. The population and sample consisted of all 89 Technical Service (Yantek) workers, selected using a total sampling technique. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using simple linear regression. The results showed that 69 respondents (77.5%) perceived work supervision as good, 42 respondents (47.2%) had a moderate level of safety motivation, and 47 respondents (52.8%) demonstrated a moderately compliant level of OSH procedure adherence. The analysis showed that work supervision did not have a statistically significant effect on workers’ compliance (p = 0.185; r = 0.142; R² = 0.020). In contrast, safety motivation had a statistically significant effect on workers’ compliance (p = 0.041; r = 0.217; R² = 0.047). Therefore, safety motivation was identified as a factor associated with workers’ compliance with OSH procedures, whereas the contribution of supervision in the present model was not statistically significant. Improving compliance requires strengthening safety motivation through OSH training, routine safety briefings, safety communication, and the development of a consistent safety culture.

References

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347

International Labour Organization. (2001). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/publications/guidelines-occupational-safety-and-health-management-systems-ilo-osh-2001

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946

Republic of Indonesia. (1970). Law No. 1 of 1970 concerning Work Safety.

Republic of Indonesia. (2012). Government Regulation No. 50 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems.

Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J. C., & Burke, M. J. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172

Clarke, S. (2006). The relationship between safety climate and safety performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.4.315

Griffin, M. A., & Neal, A. (2000). Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347

International Labour Organization. (2001). Guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/publications/guidelines-occupational-safety-and-health-management-systems-ilo-osh-2001

Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946

Vinodkumar, M. N., & Bhasi, M. (2010). Safety management practices and safety behaviour: Assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6), 2082–2093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021

Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Selawati Usman, Herlina Jusuf, & Putri Ayuningtias Mahdang. (2026). The Effect Oof Work Supervision and Safety Motivation on Workers’ Compliance with Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Procedures at Pt Pln Nusa Daya Gorontalo Service Unit. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 8(3), 2591~2599. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v8i3.11334