Criminal Liability of Police Officers in Cases of Abuse of Authority Against Protesters
Abstract
The misuse of authority by law enforcement officers in handling public demonstrations remains a recurring issue within Indonesia’s legal enforcement practices. Such incidents are frequently manifested through arbitrary arrests, excessive use of force, and the criminalization of peaceful protesters. In fact, the right to express opinions publicly is explicitly guaranteed under the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 9 of 1998. Repressive actions of this nature not only constitute legal violations but also erode public trust in the police institution. From a criminal law perspective, officers who exceed their authority may be held accountable under provisions of the Indonesian Penal Code, such as Article 170 or 351 on acts of violence, as well as through internal disciplinary sanctions. This study employs both normative and empirical approaches, examining recent cases including the May Day 2025 demonstrations and the Kanjuruhan tragedy to highlight weaknesses in oversight mechanisms, both internal and external. Findings indicate that a culture of impunity persists, allowing officers to often escape criminal liability despite evidence of misconduct. Therefore, comprehensive reforms are urgently needed, including strengthening oversight systems, ensuring consistent law enforcement, and fostering cultural transformation within the police force to ensure accountability and justice are genuinely upheld.
References
Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia (Komnas HAM). (2023, Juli 5). Tiap anggota Polri wajib terapkan prinsip-prinsip HAM dalam jalankan tugas. Komnas HAM RI. https://www.komnasham.go.id/tiap-anggota-polri-wajib-terapkan-prinsip-prinsip-ham-dalam-jalankan-tugas.
Kompas. (2025). Kompolnas: Pemerasan oleh Polisi Disebabkan Celah Kewenangan. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/kompolnas-sebut-pemerasan-oleh-polisi-karena-memanfaatkan-celah-pengamat-sebut-persoalan-sistemis.
Lestari, D. (2022). Reviktimisasi Korban Kekerasan Aparat dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 13(1), 45–62.
Nova, R. A., Achmad, R., & Suzanalisa, S. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan tembak di tempat yang dimiliki oleh anggota Polri. Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 145-209.
Nurdin, M. (2020). Budaya Impunitas dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Aparat Kepolisian. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, 9(1), 77–94.
Putra, O. D. (2024). PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA APARAT KEPOLISIAN YANG REPRESIF PADA PERISTIWA KERUSUHAN SUPPORTER DI KANJURUHAN KABUPATEN MALANG (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya).
Putri, A. (2021). Diskresi Kepolisian dan Potensi Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan dalam Penanganan Massa Aksi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(2), 221–238.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina.
Toule, E. R. M., & Sopacua, M. G. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban pidana aparat kepolisian yang melakukan kekerasan terhadap demonstran. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 79-90.
WALHI. (2020). Temuan Tindak Kekerasan Aparat: Pembungkaman Negara terhadap Aksi Protes Menolak Omnibus Law di Berbagai Wilayah. https://www.walhi.or.id/temuan-tindak-kekerasan-aparat-pembungkaman-negara-terhadap-aksi-aksi-protes-menolak-omnibus-law-di-berbagai-wilayah.
Walukow, J. M. (2013). Perwujudan Prinsip Equality Before The Law Bagi Narapidana Di Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia. Lex et Societatis, 1(1).
YLBHI. (2025). Siaran Pers: Kepolisian Harus Segera Menghentikan Kriminalisasi Massa Aksi Mayday. Tim Advokasi Demokrasi. https://ylbhi.or.id/informasi/siaran-pers/kepolisian-harus-segera-menghentikan-kriminalisasi-massa-aksi-mayday-tanpa-syarat-penikmatan-hak-konstitusional-tidak-dapat-dipidana/.
Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Setiawati, Sumartini Dewi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
