Evaluation of the Goals and Objects of Assessment of Aspects of Student Learning through Bloom’s Taxonomy
Abstract
This research aims to determine student performance at the very difficult basic education level. Education in the modern era requires a lot of evaluation that focuses on research targets and objects. One of them can be viewed from the aspects in Bloom’s Taxonomy. Bloom’s Taxonomy is a technique developed by Benjamin Bloom in 1956. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The results of this study indicate that student assessment is an important part of education and is carried out through the examination process and that test question paper readiness has reliably involved schemes. Bloom’s Taxonomy consists of three progressive models that are used to group instructive learning objectives into dimensions of multifaceted and explicit nature. Lists of cognitive domains have been the primary focus of much of traditional education and are often used to structure curriculum learning objectives, assessments and activities. Bloom’s Taxonomy is a tool that can help human services educators broaden the depth of their students’ learning. There are four classifications of learning worth noting: verifiable, applied, procedural, and meta cognitive.
References
Achmad, Ghufran Hasyim, Dwi Ratnasari, Alfauzan Amin, Eki Yuliani, dan Nidia Liandara. “Penilaian autentik pada kurikulum merdeka belajar dalam pembelajaran pendidikan agama islam di Sekolah Dasar.” Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan 4, no. 4 (2022): 5685–99.
Al-araibi, Asma Ali Mosa, Mohd Naz’ri bin Mahrin, dan Rasimah Che Mohd Yusoff. “Technological aspect factors of E-learning readiness in higher education institutions: Delphi technique.” Education and Information Technologies 24 (2019): 567–90.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.
Darmaji, Darmaji, Achmad Supriyanto, Maulana Amirul Adha, dan Agus Timan. “Internal quality assurance system in primary school (case study at Al-Kautsar plus primary school Malang).” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara 5, no. 2 (2020): 172–86.
Fadhilaturrahmi, Fadhilaturrahmi, dan Rizki Ananda. “Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPS Berbasis Taksonomi Bloom Dua Dimensi di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 1, no. 2 (2018): 12–21.
Forehand, Mary. “Bloom’s taxonomy.” Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology 41, no. 4 (2010): 47–56.
Halimah, Nur, dan Adiyono Adiyono. “Unsur-Unsur Penting Penilaian Objek Dalam Evaluasi Hasil Belajar.” EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL: General and Specific Research 2, no. 1 (2022): 160–67.
Krathwohl, David R. “A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview.” Theory into practice 41, no. 4 (2002): 212–18.
Magdalena, Ina, Nur Fajriyati Islami, Eva Alanda Rasid, dan Nadia Tasya Diasty. “Tiga ranah taksonomi bloom dalam pendidikan.” EDISI 2, no. 1 (2020): 132–39.
Mahmudi, Ihwan, Muh Zidni Athoillah, Eko Bowo Wicaksono, dan Amir Reza Kusuma. “Taksonomi Hasil Belajar Menurut Benyamin S. Bloom.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani 2, no. 9 (2022): 3507–14.
Mariati, Mariati. “Penerapan Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bertingkat Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Mahasiswa.” LIABILITIES (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI) 1, no. 2 (18 Oktober 2018): 95–111. https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v1i2.2328.
Marzuki, Ismail, dan Lukmanul Hakim. “Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam.” Tadarus Tarbawy: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan 1, no. 1 (2019).
Nafiati, Dewi Amaliah. “Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik.” Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum 21, no. 2 (2021): 151–72.
Okra, Riri, dan Yulia Novera. “Pengembangan media pembelajaran digital IPA di SMP N 3 Kecamatan Pangkalan.” Journal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies 4, no. 2 (2019): 121.
Oktaviana, Dwi, dan Iwit Prihatin. “Analisis hasil belajar siswa pada materi perbandingan berdasarkan ranah kognitif revisi taksonomi bloom.” Buana Matematika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 8, no. 2 (2018): 81–88.
Primasari, Ika Firma Ningsih Dian, Arita Marini, dan Mohamad Syarif Sumantri. “Analisis kebijakan dan pengelolaan pendidikan terkait standar penilaian di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 5, no. 3 (2021): 1479–91.
Saftari, Maya, dan Nurul Fajriah. “PENILAIAN RANAH AFEKTIF DALAM BENTUK PENILAIAN SKALA SIKAP UNTUK MENILAI HASIL BELAJAR.” Edutainment 7, no. 1 (17 Agustus 2019): 71–81. https://doi.org/10.35438/e.v7i1.164.
Salirawati, Das. “Identifikasi Problematika Evaluasi Pendidikan Karakter Di Sekolah.” Jurnal Sains Dan Edukasi Sains 4, no. 1 (1 April 2021): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v4i1p17-27.
Sudaryono. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2012.
Suharman, Agus, dan Rezky Ramadhona. “ANALISIS SOAL-SOAL UJI KOMPETENSI PADA BUKU TEKS MATEMATIKA SMA KELAS XI PEMINATAN IPA SEMESTER 1 BERDASARKAN TINGKAT KOGNITIF TAKSONOMI BLOOM.” TANJAK?: Journal of Education and Teaching 1, no. 1 (29 Januari 2020): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.35961/tanjak.v1i1.81.
Utama, Danar Gayuh, dan Hana Permata Heldisari. “Pembelajaran Dinamika pada Ansambel Gitar Ditinjau dari Aspek Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor.” Journal of Music Education and Performing Arts 1, no. 1 (2021): 16–22.
Viscione, Ilaria, Francesca D’Elia, Rodolfo Vastola, dan Maurizio Sibilio. “Psychomotor Assessment in Teaching and Educational Research.” Athens Journal of Education 4, no. 2 (Mei 2017): 169–77.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rizwan Muhammad Rizwan Ilhami
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
