Improving Learning Outcome Through Mind Mapping Learning Model in International Trade Law at STHB
Abstract
International trade law is one of subjects at Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung (STHB) in semester VI. It provides some theories to be applied in the field, especially those related to international trade. Students must be able to apply the theories through case analysis. However, the problem found in the classroom is the students have difficulty understanding the materials so the learning outcomes are not satisfactory. This research is limited to the application of mind mapping models in international trade law and is limited to certain subjects, namely Class A students in semester VI at STHB for the Academic Year 2021/2022. The problems identified were related to the application of the mind mapping model in international trade law, and how much improvement in learning outcomes. This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR). The approach is a mixed method. The research was conducted on a two-cycle CAR. The data used were from students of Class A.The data collection method is the observation method. The result of thisresearch is that the application of learning using the mind mapping model inthe international trade law course proved successful, and the increase inlearning outcomes was very high.
References
2.Bali MM. Peran Dosen dalam Mengembangkan Karakter Mahasiswa. HUMANIORA.2013;4(2):800–10.
3.Mappeasse MY. Pengaruh Cara dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar ProgrammableLogic Controller (PLC) Siswa Kelas III Jurusan Listrik SMK Negeri 5 Makassar. JMEDTEK. 2009;1(2).
4.Gagné RM. The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Fourth. McPeek E,editor. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1985.
5.Gredler MEB. Belajar dan Membelajarkan. First. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada; 1994.
6.Lindgreen HC. Educational Psychology in the Classroom. New York: John Wiley & Sonc,Inc.; 1956.
7.Djamaluddin A, Wardana. Belajar dan Pembelajaran: 4 Pilar Peningkatan KompetensiPedagogis. Parepare: Kaaffah Learning Center; 2019.
8.Gagné RM. Prinsip-Prinsip Belajar untuk Pengajaran (Essential of Learning for Instruction).Surabaya: Usaha Nasional; 1988.
9.Sudjana N. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Surjaman T, editor. Bandung: RemajaRosdakarya; 2019.
10.Dick W, Carey L, Carey JO. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Eight ed. Johnston J,editor. New Jersey: Pearson; 2015.
11.Ahmadiyanto. Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan MediaPembelajaran KO-RUF-SI (KOTAK HURUF EDUKASI) Berbasis Word Square padaMateri Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Sistem Pemerintahan di Indonesia Kelas VIIIC SMP Negeri 1Lampihong Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2. J Pendidik Kewarganegaraan. 2016;6(2):980–93.
12.Febryananda IP, Rosy B. PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN SOSIODRAMATERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI OTKP PADA KOMPETENSIDASAR MENERAPKAN PELAYANAN PRIMA KEPADA PELANGGAN DI SMKN 2KEDIRI. J Pendidik Adm Perkantoran. 2019;7(4):170–4.
13.Fauhah H, Rosy B. Analisis Model Pembelajaran Make A Match terhadap Hasil BelajarSiswa. J Pendidik Adm Perkantorann(JPAP). 2021;9(2):321–34.
14.Kosilah, Septian. PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPEASSURE DALAM MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA. J Inov Penelit.2020;1(6):1139–48.
15.Fitriani. PENGARUH MOTIVASI BELAJAR DAN DISIPLIN TERHADAP HASILBELAJAR IPS SISWA DI SMP KARYA INDAH KECAMATAN TAPUNG. J PeKA.2016;4(2):137–42.
16.Nutrisiana D. PENGARUH MOTIVASI BELAJAR, CARA BELAJAR,DANKEMAMPUAN SOSIAL-EKONOMI ORANG TUA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJARMATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI SISWA KELAS XI IPS MA AL-ASROR SEMARANGTAHUN AJARAN 2012/2013. Econ Educ Anal J. 2013;2(2):97–102.
17.Sulastri, Imran, Firmansyah A. Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui StrategiPembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Pada Mata Pelajaran IPS di Kelas V SDN 2 Limbo MakmurKecamatan Bumi Raya. JKO J Kreat Online. 2015;3(1):90–103.
18.Sanjaya W. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. First ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group; 2011.
19.Indrawan R, Yaniawati RP. Metodologi Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Campuranuntuk Manajemen, Pembangunan, dan Pendidikan. Atif NF, editor. Bandung: RefikaAditama; 2017.
20.Creswell JW. Gambaran Dasar Riset Mixed Methods. Malini H, editor. Yogyakarta,Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar; 2020.
21.Fadli MR. Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika. 2021;21(1):33–54.
22.Ishaq H. Langkah dan Tahap Penelitian Hukum. In: Metode Penelitian Hukum: PenulisanSkripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta; 2017.
23.Mulyadi M. PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF DAN KUALITATIF SERTA PEMIKIRAN DASAR MENGGABUNGKANNYA. J Stud Komun DAN MEDIA. 2011;15(1):127–38.
24.Suprijono A. Cooperative Learning: Teori & Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar; 2020.
25.Tee TK, Azman MNA, Mohamed S, Yunos JM, Mohamad MM, Muhammad M, et al.Buzan Mind Mapping: An Efficient Technique for Note-Taking. Int J Soc Hum Sci Eng.2014;8(1):28–31.
26.Kustian NG. PENGGUNAAN METODE MIND MAPPING DALAM MENINGKATKANHASIL BELAJAR SISWA. Acad J Inov Ris Akad. 2021;1(1):30–7.
27.Aprinawati I. PENGGUNAAN MODEL PETA PIKIRAN (MIND MAPPING) UNTUKMENINGKATKAN PEMAHAMAN MEMBACA WACANA SISWA SEKOLAHDASAR. J Basicedu. 2018;2(1):140–7.
