The Influence of Motivation and Work Environment on Teacher Performance at SDN Boneoge, Donggala Regency

  • Rukhayati Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu, Indonesia
Keywords: Work Motivation, Environment, Performance

Abstract

The study's results simultaneously show that the independent variable, namely Motivation, justifies the first hypothesis, which states that it has a positive and significant influence on teacher performance at SDN Boneoge, Donggala Regency. This is evident from the results of the f test, obtaining a value of = 6.730 accepted with a significant level of 5% (0.00 Ë‚ 0.05) is proven. Work motivation positively affects teacher performance at SDN Boneoge, Donggala Regency. This is not established from the test results. T obtained ngs significant level of 2.303 5% (0.003 Ë‚ 0.05 ) and was accepted. This means the higher the teacher's work motivation, the more performance will increase. The work environment positively affects teacher performance at SDN Boneoge, Donggala Regency. This is not proven from the results of the t-test obtained value 3.030 at a significant level of 5% (0.005 Ë‚ 0.05), and  accepted. This means the higher the teacher's work environment, the more performance will increase.

 

References

1. Idzhar A. The role of the teacher in increasing student learning motivation. J Off. 2016;2(2):221–8.
2. Ariyanto A, Sulistyorini S. Basic motivational concepts and applications in Islamic educational institutions. AL-ASASIYYA J Basic Educ. 2020;4(2):103–14.
3. Fudzah N. The Effect Of Communication And Work Environment On Employee Performance With Motivation As Variable Intervening At Pt. Pos Indonesia Regional Office I Medan. 2020.
4. Makbul M. Data collection methods and research instruments. 2021;
5. Nurlan F. Quantitative research methodology. CV. Archipelago Pillars; 2019.
6. Mardiatmoko G. The importance of the classical assumption test in multiple linear regression analysis (a case study of the development of allometric equations for young walnuts [canarium Indicum l.]). BAREKENG J Mat and Applied Science. 2020;14(3):333–42.
7. Sukestiyarno YL, Agoestanto A. Limitation of the prerequisites for the normality test and homogeneity test in the linear regression model. Unnes J Math. 2017;6(2):168–77.
8. Ningsih S, Dukalang HH. Application of interval successive method in multiple linear regression analysis. Jambura J Math. 2019;1(1):43–53.
9. Novia AD. Comparative analysis of Durbin-Watson and Breusch-Godfrey autocorrelation tests. Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University; 2012.
10. Khoiroh U. Heteroscedasticity Test in Nonparametric Regression. AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY; 2011.
11. Kurniawan R. Regression analysis. Prenada Media; 2016.
12. Matondang Z. The validity and reliability of a research instrument. J tabularasa. 2009;6(1):87–97.
13. Darma B. Research Statistics Using SPSS (Validity Test, Reliability Test, Simple Linear Regression, Multiple Linear Regression, t-Test, F Test, R2). Guepedia; 2021.
14. Janie DNA. Descriptive statistics & multiple linear regression with SPSS. Journal, April. 2012;
15. Widhiarso W, UGM FP. Questions and answers about the normality test. Faculty of Psychology UGM. 2012;1–5.
Published
2023-01-14
How to Cite
Rukhayati. (2023). The Influence of Motivation and Work Environment on Teacher Performance at SDN Boneoge, Donggala Regency. International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 5(1), 47-57. https://doi.org/10.56338/ijhess.v5i1.3201
Section
Articles