Indonesian National Interest in South China Sea Conflict Settlement
Abstract
The issue of the South China Sea conflict as part of the political constellation of the Asia Pacific region has been going on for decades, but until now it has not been resolved even though various settlement efforts have been made by the disputing parties. Although Indonesia is not part of a country that claims territory in the South China Sea (non-claimante state), Indonesia has an interest in efforts to resolve the South China Sea conflict. The purpose of the study is to analyze Indonesia's national interest in efforts to resolve conflicts in the South China Sea. This study uses a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. Data collection techniques using literature study. The results of the study indicate that Indonesia's national interests in efforts to resolve conflicts in the South China Sea are: Securing national territorial integrity, Securing Economic Resources and protecting the safety of citizens.
References
Ward K, Juvyns V. 2019 investment outlook : Mid-year update [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://am.jpmorgan.com/ch/en/asset-management/per/insights/market-insights/investment-outlook/trade-war-impact-on-global-economy/
Kusila SFR, Raharyo A. The Impact of Trade War between the United States of America And the People ’ s Republic of China towards the Economic Conditions of ASEAN Countries during 2018-2019. J Int Relations. 2022;2(1):22–33.
Nainggolan PP, Roza R, Muhammad SV. Konflik laut china selatan dan implikasinya terhadap kawasan. Jakarta: P3DI Setjen DPR RI dan Azza Grafika; 2013.
Asian Development Bank. Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian century. Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian Century. Singapore: Asian Development Bank; 2011.
Swanstrom N, Panda J. AUKUS : Resetting European Thinking on the Indo-PAsific? Sweden: Instirute For Security and Development Policy; 2021.
Bailey KD. Methods of Social Research. 4th ed. Ney York: The Free Press; 2007.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry & research design; Choosing among five approach. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2018.
Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis : A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2014.
Nguyen DM. Settlement of disputes under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea The case of the South China Sea dispute. 2005;
Junef M. Maritime Territorial Dispute in South China Sea. Jure. 2018;18(740):219–40.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. South China Sea [Internet]. Vol. 2013. 2013. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/international/content/analysis/regions_of_interest/South_China_Sea/south_china_sea.pdf
Schofield C. Fish, not oil, at the heart of the South China Sea conflict [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.fni.no/news/fish-not-oil-at-the-heart-of-the-south-china-sea-conflict-article1556-330.html
Centre fos Strategic and International Studies. How Much Trade Transits the South China Sea? [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 5]. Available from: https://chinapower.csis.org/much-trade-transits-south-china-sea/
Baumert K, Melchior B. Limits in the Seas : Maritime Claims in the South Sea [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.state.gov/e/oes/ocns/opa/c16065.htm.
Nasir M, Sitiadibah W, Dahalan W. The Islands Claimed By Malaysia In The Spratly Islands : A Review Based On United Nations ConventionOn The Law Of The. J Humanit Soc Sci. 2017;22(9):7–17.
Ras AR. Konflik Laut Cina Selatan dan Ketahanan Regional Asia Pasifik: Sudut Pandang Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Abdi Persada Siporennu Indonesia; 2001.
Lisbet. Respons Indonesia terhadap Kemitraan Keamanan Australia, Inggris dan Amerika Serikat. Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Sekretariat Jenderal DPR RI. 2021;(September).
Vuving AL. AUKUS Is a Short-Term Mess but a Long-Term Win for Australia [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Mar 2]. Available from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/10/11/aukus-australia-long-term-win/
Putro YBYP. Menyikapi Potensi Eskalasi Konflik Di Kawasan Indo-Pasifik Sebagai Dampak Dari Kesepakatan Aukus [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 2]. Available from: https://setkab.go.id/menyikapi-potensi-eskalasi-konflik-di-kawasan-indo-pasifik-sebagai-dampak-dari-kesepakatan-aukus/
Alfath TP, Nugroho RL. Diplomasi Soft Power Asimetris Berbasis Sumber Daya Kelautan Lintas Batas Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Laut Cina Selatan. Legality. 2017;24(2):157–71.
Kementerian Pertahanan RI. Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertahanan; 2015.
Kristine H. Kepentingan Indonesia Memprakarsai Code Of Conduct of Parties di Laut CIna Selatan. Universitas Jember; 2015.
Yang Lu. Dynamics of National Interest and National Identity. University of Heidelberg; 2013.
Isomov M. The Philosophy of National Interest in The Context of International Relations. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;07(02):6244–51.
Matthew G. Kepentingan Nasional dan Diplomasi ala Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar. J Hub Int. 2020;XIII(1):39–52.
Edmuns T. Complexity, Strategy and the National Interest. Int Aff [Internet]. 2014;90(3):525–39. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24538507
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 Tentang Kebijakan Umum Pertahanan Negara Tahun 2020-2024. 2021.
Tidwell AC. Conflict resolved? A critical assessment of conflict resolution. London: Pinter; 1998.
Gusti. Indonesia Kembali Menjadi Ketua ASEAN Tahun 2023 [Internet]. UGM.AC.ID. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.ugm.ac.id/id/berita/21086-indonesia-kembali-menjadi-ketua-asean-tahun-2023
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
