Settlement of Criminal Actions Not Appearing Without Permission Through Military Discipline Legal Mechanism in Order Unit and Personnel Development
Abstract
The law that applies specifically to military personnel consists of formal and material Military Criminal Law, apart from that there is also military discipline law which is regulated by law. Military crimes can be divided into two, namely pure military crimes and mixed military crimes. One of the pure military crimes is the crime of not being present without permission. The crime of being present without permission is generally regulated in CHAPTER III Book II of the Military Criminal Code, but this crime is also regulated in the Military Discipline Law as a violation of military discipline. With these conflicting legal regulations, the author then raises this problem into a thesis. The problem formulation that the author presents is: How is military disciplinary law applied to the crime of not being present without permission and what are the consequences of resolving THTI crimes through military disciplinary legal mechanisms in the face of unit and personnel development? There are three possibilities for resolving THTI crimes through military disciplinary legal channels. . The research method in this thesis is normative juridical using military discipline law enforcement theory, unit and personnel development theory and legal certainty theory. The conclusion of this research is that the criminal act of not being present without permission can be resolved through military disciplinary law, namely a criminal act in the narrow sense, namely Article 85 1 and Article 86 1 of the KUHPM. Completion of legal discipline will of course have an impact on the development of the unit and personnel concerned in the form of postponement of rank or education.
References
A. Buku
Agustinus, and Prastopo. Paradigma Baru Hukum Disiplin Militer Undang-undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Anwar, R. Hubungan Sipil Militer di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Study Group Mahasiswa Cempaka Putih', 1967.
Ariesandi. Rahasia Mendidik Anak Agar Sukses dan Bahagia, Tips dan Terpuji Melejitkan Potensi Optimal Anak. Jakarta: Dramedia pustaka Utama, 2008.
Arifin, Muhammad. Teori dan Filsafat Hukum-Idealisme dan Problema Keadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1994.
Bassar, M. Sudrajat. Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu di dalam KUHP. Bandung: Remaja Karya, 2003.
Buaton, Tiarsen. Peradilan Militer dalm kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.
Lexy. J, Moelong. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdarkarya, 2000.
Marjoto. Hukum Pidana Tentara. Bogor: Politea, 1958.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2005.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Poernomo, Bambang. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2001.
Pujiono, Sisno. “JuridicalAnalysisOfApplication Of Forgiveness (Rechterlijk Pardon) As A Basis Of Judge Consideration In DecidingThe Criminal.” Jurnal daulat Hukum, 2020: 12.
Raharjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
Salam, Moch. Faisal. Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2006.
Siantur. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Storia Grafika, 2002.
Sianturi. Hukum Pidana Militer di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Tentara Nasional Indonesia, 2010.
Siddiq, Muhammad. Pola Komunikasi pada Sub Dinas Pembinaan Mental dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Disiplin Prajurit Di Markas Komando Korps Marinir. Jakarta: PT Eresco, 2010.
Soekamto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif (suatu tinjauan singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2001.
Sulaiman, Abdullah. Metode Pennulisan Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: YPPSDM, 2012.
Suroso. Penghantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Susanto, Astrid S. Komunikasi Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 2004.
Sutopo, H.B. Metode penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UNS Pers, 2006.
Tambunan, A.S.S. Hukum Militer suatu Pengatar. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum Militer Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer, 2005.
Zainal, Asikin. Penghantar Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2012.
Zainal, Rivain. Hukum Militer I. Bandung: Pusat Infantri, 1987.
B. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1947 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Militer (KUHPM).
______, Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 1997 tentang Hukum Disiplin Prajurit Angkatan Bersenjata Republik Indonesia, LN. 1997
______, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1997 tentang Peradilan Militer, LN LN. 1997
______, Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia, LN Tahun 2004, No 127
______, Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Disiplin Militer
______, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 39 Tahun 2010 Tentang Administrasi Prajurit tentara Nasional Indonesia, LN. 2010 No. 50
______,Putusan Pengadilan Militer Bandung Nomor 131-K/PM.II-09/AD/XI/2023
Markas Besar Tentara Nasional indonesia, Peraturan Panglima Tentara Nasional Indonesia Nomor Perpang/45/VII/2008 Tanggal 21 Juli 2008
Markas Besar Angkatan Darat, Bujuklak Pembinaan satuan TNI AD SKEP/542/XII/2006 hal 137 ttg pengertian Binsat.
C. Jurnal
Parluhutan Sagala dan Fredy Ferdian, Yurisdiksi Peradilan Militer dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Rev 2 ( Jakarta : E-Jurnal Dilmiltama, 2016)
_______, Beberapa Catatan Tentang Hukum Militer, dimuat dalam Majalah Citra Buana Kodam VII/Wirabuana, Makassar, Volume IV, Nomor 11, Desember 2008.
SisnoPujinoto,et.al, “JuridicalAnalysisOfApplication Of Forgiveness (Rechterlijk Pardon) As A Basis Of Judge Consideration In DecidingThe Criminal”,JurnalDaulatHukum, Volume3 Issue2,Juni2020, ISSN:2614-560X
D. Internet
https://ngobrolinhukum.wordpress.com/memahami-kepastian-dalamhukum/. Diakses pada tanggal 11 Mei 2024
Copyright (c) 2024 Nyoman Agus Surya Pradipta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
