Editorial Workflow
Medical and Health Journey Journal
The Medical and Health Journey Journal implements a rigorous and transparent editorial workflow to ensure the quality, integrity, and timeliness of the publication process.
Manuscript Submission
Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal’s online submission system. Submissions must comply with the journal’s Submission Guidelines, including formatting, ethical requirements, and completeness of metadata.
Initial Screening (Editorial Office Check)
The editorial office conducts a preliminary evaluation to ensure that the manuscript:
- Fits the journal’s scope
- Meets basic formatting requirements
- Includes all necessary documents (cover letter, ethical approval, etc.)
Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be returned to authors for correction or rejected.
Plagiarism Screening
All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software such as:
- Turnitin
- iThenticate
Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding the acceptable threshold (? 20%) may be rejected or returned for revision.
Editor Assignment
Eligible manuscripts are assigned to a Section Editor or Handling Editor with expertise relevant to the manuscript’s subject area.
Double-Blind Peer Review
The journal applies a double-blind peer review process, where:
- Authors and reviewers remain anonymous
- At least two independent reviewers are assigned
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodology, clarity, and scientific contribution.
Reviewer Reports and Editorial Decision
Based on reviewers’ comments, the editor makes one of the following decisions:
- Accept
- Minor Revision
- Major Revision
- Reject
The decision is communicated to the authors along with reviewer feedback.
Revision Stage
Authors are required to:
- Revise the manuscript according to reviewer comments
- Provide a detailed response to each comment
Revised manuscripts may be sent back to reviewers for further evaluation if necessary.
Final Decision
The Editor-in-Chief or Handling Editor makes the final decision based on:
- Reviewer recommendations
- Quality of revisions
- Compliance with journal standards
Copyediting and Proofreading
Accepted manuscripts undergo:
- Language editing
- Formatting adjustments
- Reference verification
Authors will receive proofs for final approval before publication.
Layout and Production
The manuscript is formatted into the journal’s final layout (PDF/HTML) and prepared for publication.
Publication
Articles are published online in the current issue and assigned:
- DOI (Digital Object Identifier)
- Page numbers
The journal follows an open access policy, ensuring free access to all published content.
Post-Publication
The journal ensures:
- Indexing and archiving in relevant databases
- Handling of corrections, retractions, or updates if necessary
Estimated Timeline
- Initial Screening: 3–7 days
- Peer Review: 2–6 weeks
- Revision: 1–3 weeks (depending on authors)
- Final Decision: 1–2 weeks
- Publication: 2–4 weeks after acceptance
Ethical Oversight
The editorial workflow adheres to international standards, including:
- COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines
- Transparency and accountability in decision-making
Final Notes
The journal is committed to:
- Fair and unbiased review process
- Timely communication with authors and reviewers
- Continuous improvement of editorial quality
