FENOMENA “NO VIRAL NO JUSTICE” DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN DI INDONESIA
Keywords:
Penegakan Hukum, No Viral No Justice.
Abstract
Fenomena “ Law Is Viral ” menggambarkan adanya pergesaran paradigma penegakan hukum diera digital. Viralitas di media social kerap menjadi factor penentu dalam mendorong respon aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini menkaji peran viralitas media social dalam membentuk akses public terhadap keadilan di Indonesia yang dikenal dengan ‘Tak Viral, Tak Ada Keadilan’. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiolegal, penelitaan ini menganalisis dinamika anatata tekan public digital dan respon aparat penegak hukum dalam sejumlah kasus yang menjadi viral. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa viralitas dapat mempercepat respon Negara dalam menangani suatu kasus dana membuka ruang bagi partisipati publik. Namun, fenomena ini juga berpotensi merusak prinsip – prinsip dasar dalam sistem peradilan, khususnya prinsip due process of law, dan menimbulkan disparitas dalam penanganan kasus viral dan non – viral. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penting merumuskan kerangka regulasi yang menyeimbangkan partisipa publik melalui media digital sebagai alat kontrol sosial dengan perlindungan integritas, idependensi, dan objektivitas sistem hukum.
References
1. Ruman, Y. S. (2012). Keadilan Hukum dan Penerapannya dalam Pengadilan. Humaniora, 3(2), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v3i2.3327
2. Wuryantai, A. G. E. W. (2024). Digitalisasi masyarakat: Menilik kekuatan dan kelemahan dinamika era informasi digital dan masyarakat informasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v1i2.163
3. Sumirat, I. R. (2020). Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Dalam Bingkai Moralitas. Al Qisthas: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Ketatanegaraan, 11(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.37035/alqisthas.v11i2.3827
4. Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 199–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.3.74
5. Habsyi, M. H. Al. (2022). Belajar dari Fenomena “No Viral No Justice.” News Detik Com. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5883436/belajar-dari-fenomena-no-viral-no-justice
6. Sampedro, V., & Avidad, M. M. (2018). The digital public sphere: An alternative and counterhegemonic space? The case of Spain. International journal of communication, 12, 22. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6943
7. Cohen, J., Fung, A., Bernholz, L., Landemore, H., & Reich, R. (2021). Democracy and the digital public sphere. Digital technology and democratic theory, 23–61. Retrieved from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/democracy-and-digital-public-sphere
8. Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Digital public sphere. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 15, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087
9. Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.
10. CNN Indonesia. (2023). Sindiran “No Viral No Justice” dan Balasan “No Baper” dari Polri. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230630013657-12- 967952/sindiran-no-viral-no-justice-dan-balasan-no-baper-dari-polri
11. Sumampouw, S. S. (2023). “No Viral No Justice” dan Lemahnya Pengawasan Internal Kepolisian. Kumparan. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://kumparan.com/sstanleysumampouw/no-viral-no-justice-dan- lemahnya-pengawasan-internal-kepolisian-20KAULWQadt/3
12. Papacharissi, Z. (2008). The virtual sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pg. 230–245). London: Routledge.
13. Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres.
Journal of communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
14. Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. The sociological review, 52(1_suppl), 131–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 954X.2004.00477.x
15. De Blasio, E., Kneuer, M., Schünemann, W., & Sorice, M. (2020). The ongoing transformation of the digital public sphere: Basic considerations on a moving target. Media and Communication, 8(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3639
16. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The aNNalS of the american academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
17. Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
18. Cotterrell, R. (1984). The sociology of law: An introduction. Austl. JL & Soc’y, 2, 90. London: Butterworths
19. Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the end (s) of law: novel entanglements of law and technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
20. Di Pietro, R., Caprolu, M., & Raponi, S. (2020). Next Generation Information Warfare: Rationales, Scenarios, Threats, and Open Issues. In P. Mori, S. Furnell, & O. Camp (Ed.), Information Systems Security and Privacy (Vol. 1221, pg. 24–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49443-8_2
21. Okide, C. C., Lucynda Koledoye, U., Mbagwu, F., Osilike, C., Mercy Okeke, N., Ebele Ekwealor, N., & Ugochukwu,
K. (2019). Benefits of Online Media in Community Development and Community Engagement. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 5385–5390. https://doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2019.5385.5390
22. Nikijuluw, G. M. E., Rorong, A. J., & Londa, V. (2020). Perilaku Masyarakat Di Era Digital (Studi Di Desa Watutumou Iii Kecamata Kalawat Kabupaten Minahasa Utara). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(92). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/29464
23. Koentjaraningrat, K. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi, edisi revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
24. Kuswarno, E. (2015). Potret Wajah Masyarakat Digital Indonesia. Jurnal Communicate, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jc.v1i1.36
25. Utomo, L. (2023). Menyoal No Viral No Justice dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Laraspost.Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.laraspost.com/ragam/9879162332/menyoal-no-viral-no-justice-dalam- penegakan-hukum-di-indonesia
26. Chaterine, R. N. (2021). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice", Ini 4 Kasus yang Baru Ditangani Polisi setelah Viral di Medsos. Nasional Kompas. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/12/17/17514801/fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-ini-4-kasus- yang-baru-ditangani-polisi-setelah
27. Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Publiciana, 9(1), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.36563/publiciana.v9i1.79
28. Steele, J. (2013). “Trial by the Press”: An Examination of Journalism, Ethics, and Islam in Indonesia and Malaysia. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213484588
29. Bata, F. C. O., & Wahid, U. (2020). Diskursus Kredibilitas dan Pertimbangan Etika Pers dalam Proses Produksi Berita Viral# Justiceforaudrey di Liputan 6 Siang SCTV. LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31334/lugas.v4i1.935
30. Wardah, F. (2024). Fenomena “‘No Viral, No Justice’,” Bukti Kekecewaan Publik pada Penegakan Hukum. Voa Indonesia. Retrieved January 31, 2025, from https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/fenomena-no-viral-no- justice-bukti-kekecewaan-publik-pada-penegakan-hukum/7907583.html?utm_source=
31. Austin, J. (1861). The province of jurisprudence determined (Vol. 2). London: J. Murray.
32. Hart, H. L. A., & Green, L. (2012). The concept of law. England: Oxford University Press.
33. Nugroho, H. (2024). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice” sebagai Kritik Penegakan Hukum. Komisi Yudisial. Retrieved January 31, 2025, from https://komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/news_detail/15710/fenomena-no- viral-no-justice-sebagai-kritik-penegakan-hukum?utm_source=
34. Rosa, N. (2023). Pakar Telisik Fenomena No Viral No Justice di Indonesia: Bentuk Kepedulian Masyarakat, tapi. Detik. Retrieved January 29, 2025, https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-7021617/pakar-telisik- fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-di-indonesia-bentuk-kepedulian-masyarakat-tapi?utm_source=
35. Kharisma, D. B. (2025). No viral no justice: is it a principle of social justice? (Study of viral cases on social media in Indonesia). Safer Communities, 24(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-07-2024-0037
36. Holmes Jr, O. W. (2009). The path of the law. New Zealand: The Floating Press.
37. Llewellyn, K. N. (2012). The bramble bush: On our law and its study. New Orleans, La.: Quid Pro Books.
38. Unger, R. M. (1983). The critical legal studies movement. Harvard law review, 561–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341032
39. Kennedy, D. (2017). Form and substance in private law adjudication. In The Sociology of Law (p. 415–424). London: Routledge.
40. Nonet, P., Selznick, P., & Kagan, R. A. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. London: Routledge.
2. Wuryantai, A. G. E. W. (2024). Digitalisasi masyarakat: Menilik kekuatan dan kelemahan dinamika era informasi digital dan masyarakat informasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v1i2.163
3. Sumirat, I. R. (2020). Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Dalam Bingkai Moralitas. Al Qisthas: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Ketatanegaraan, 11(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.37035/alqisthas.v11i2.3827
4. Santoyo. (2008). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(3), 199–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.3.74
5. Habsyi, M. H. Al. (2022). Belajar dari Fenomena “No Viral No Justice.” News Detik Com. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5883436/belajar-dari-fenomena-no-viral-no-justice
6. Sampedro, V., & Avidad, M. M. (2018). The digital public sphere: An alternative and counterhegemonic space? The case of Spain. International journal of communication, 12, 22. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6943
7. Cohen, J., Fung, A., Bernholz, L., Landemore, H., & Reich, R. (2021). Democracy and the digital public sphere. Digital technology and democratic theory, 23–61. Retrieved from https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/democracy-and-digital-public-sphere
8. Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Digital public sphere. The international encyclopedia of political communication, 15, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087
9. Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.
10. CNN Indonesia. (2023). Sindiran “No Viral No Justice” dan Balasan “No Baper” dari Polri. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230630013657-12- 967952/sindiran-no-viral-no-justice-dan-balasan-no-baper-dari-polri
11. Sumampouw, S. S. (2023). “No Viral No Justice” dan Lemahnya Pengawasan Internal Kepolisian. Kumparan. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://kumparan.com/sstanleysumampouw/no-viral-no-justice-dan- lemahnya-pengawasan-internal-kepolisian-20KAULWQadt/3
12. Papacharissi, Z. (2008). The virtual sphere 2.0: The Internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In Routledge handbook of Internet politics (pg. 230–245). London: Routledge.
13. Bennett, W. L., & Pfetsch, B. (2018). Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres.
Journal of communication, 68(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx017
14. Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. The sociological review, 52(1_suppl), 131–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 954X.2004.00477.x
15. De Blasio, E., Kneuer, M., Schünemann, W., & Sorice, M. (2020). The ongoing transformation of the digital public sphere: Basic considerations on a moving target. Media and Communication, 8(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3639
16. Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The aNNalS of the american academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 78–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877
17. Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
18. Cotterrell, R. (1984). The sociology of law: An introduction. Austl. JL & Soc’y, 2, 90. London: Butterworths
19. Hildebrandt, M. (2015). Smart technologies and the end (s) of law: novel entanglements of law and technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
20. Di Pietro, R., Caprolu, M., & Raponi, S. (2020). Next Generation Information Warfare: Rationales, Scenarios, Threats, and Open Issues. In P. Mori, S. Furnell, & O. Camp (Ed.), Information Systems Security and Privacy (Vol. 1221, pg. 24–47). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49443-8_2
21. Okide, C. C., Lucynda Koledoye, U., Mbagwu, F., Osilike, C., Mercy Okeke, N., Ebele Ekwealor, N., & Ugochukwu,
K. (2019). Benefits of Online Media in Community Development and Community Engagement. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(2), 5385–5390. https://doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2019.5385.5390
22. Nikijuluw, G. M. E., Rorong, A. J., & Londa, V. (2020). Perilaku Masyarakat Di Era Digital (Studi Di Desa Watutumou Iii Kecamata Kalawat Kabupaten Minahasa Utara). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 6(92). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/29464
23. Koentjaraningrat, K. (2009). Pengantar ilmu antropologi, edisi revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
24. Kuswarno, E. (2015). Potret Wajah Masyarakat Digital Indonesia. Jurnal Communicate, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/jc.v1i1.36
25. Utomo, L. (2023). Menyoal No Viral No Justice dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Laraspost.Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://www.laraspost.com/ragam/9879162332/menyoal-no-viral-no-justice-dalam- penegakan-hukum-di-indonesia
26. Chaterine, R. N. (2021). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice", Ini 4 Kasus yang Baru Ditangani Polisi setelah Viral di Medsos. Nasional Kompas. Retrieved July 10, 2023, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/12/17/17514801/fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-ini-4-kasus- yang-baru-ditangani-polisi-setelah
27. Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Publiciana, 9(1), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.36563/publiciana.v9i1.79
28. Steele, J. (2013). “Trial by the Press”: An Examination of Journalism, Ethics, and Islam in Indonesia and Malaysia. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213484588
29. Bata, F. C. O., & Wahid, U. (2020). Diskursus Kredibilitas dan Pertimbangan Etika Pers dalam Proses Produksi Berita Viral# Justiceforaudrey di Liputan 6 Siang SCTV. LUGAS Jurnal Komunikasi, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31334/lugas.v4i1.935
30. Wardah, F. (2024). Fenomena “‘No Viral, No Justice’,” Bukti Kekecewaan Publik pada Penegakan Hukum. Voa Indonesia. Retrieved January 31, 2025, from https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/fenomena-no-viral-no- justice-bukti-kekecewaan-publik-pada-penegakan-hukum/7907583.html?utm_source=
31. Austin, J. (1861). The province of jurisprudence determined (Vol. 2). London: J. Murray.
32. Hart, H. L. A., & Green, L. (2012). The concept of law. England: Oxford University Press.
33. Nugroho, H. (2024). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice” sebagai Kritik Penegakan Hukum. Komisi Yudisial. Retrieved January 31, 2025, from https://komisiyudisial.go.id/frontend/news_detail/15710/fenomena-no- viral-no-justice-sebagai-kritik-penegakan-hukum?utm_source=
34. Rosa, N. (2023). Pakar Telisik Fenomena No Viral No Justice di Indonesia: Bentuk Kepedulian Masyarakat, tapi. Detik. Retrieved January 29, 2025, https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-7021617/pakar-telisik- fenomena-no-viral-no-justice-di-indonesia-bentuk-kepedulian-masyarakat-tapi?utm_source=
35. Kharisma, D. B. (2025). No viral no justice: is it a principle of social justice? (Study of viral cases on social media in Indonesia). Safer Communities, 24(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-07-2024-0037
36. Holmes Jr, O. W. (2009). The path of the law. New Zealand: The Floating Press.
37. Llewellyn, K. N. (2012). The bramble bush: On our law and its study. New Orleans, La.: Quid Pro Books.
38. Unger, R. M. (1983). The critical legal studies movement. Harvard law review, 561–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341032
39. Kennedy, D. (2017). Form and substance in private law adjudication. In The Sociology of Law (p. 415–424). London: Routledge.
40. Nonet, P., Selznick, P., & Kagan, R. A. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward responsive law. London: Routledge.
Published
2025-08-23
Section
Article
