Peran Chat Gpt dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Akademik Mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara : Kajian Studi Literatur

The Role Of Chatgpt In Academic Decision-Making Among Students In The Public Administration Program: A Literature Review

  • Mike Delsi Nitsae Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Nusa Cendana-Indonesia
  • Angelique Feodora Karissa Gaspersz Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Universitas Nusa Cendana-Indonesia
Keywords: ChatGPT, Pengambilan Keputusan Akademik, Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Kecerdasan Buatan, Studi Literatur, ChatGPT, Academic Decision-Making, Public Administration, Artificial Intelligence, Literature Review

Abstract

Perkembangan kecerdasan buatan, khususnya ChatGPT, telah membawa perubahan signifikan dalam dunia pendidikan tinggi, termasuk pada program studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran ChatGPT dalam mendukung pengambilan keputusan akademik mahasiswa Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur dengan mengkaji berbagai sumber ilmiah yang diterbitkan dalam rentang tahun 2019 hingga 2024. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ChatGPT berperan sebagai alat bantu dalam proses pencarian informasi, penyusunan tugas akademik, pemahaman konsep kebijakan publik, serta perencanaan studi. Penggunaan ChatGPT memberikan kemudahan akses terhadap sumber pengetahuan yang relevan, namun juga menimbulkan kekhawatiran terkait akurasi informasi, ketergantungan teknologi, dan integritas akademik. Temuan ini menggambarkan perlunya kebijakan penggunaan kecerdasan buatan yang terintegrasi dalam kurikulum pendidikan administrasi negara.

ABSTRACT

The development of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has brought significant changes to higher education, including in Public Administration study programs. This study aims to analyze the role of ChatGPT in supporting academic decision-making among students of the Public Administration Study Program. The method employed is a literature review examining various scientific sources published between 2019 and 2024. The findings indicate that ChatGPT serves as a tool in the process of information retrieval, academic task completion, understanding of public policy concepts, and study planning. The use of ChatGPT provides easier access to relevant knowledge sources; however, it also raises concerns regarding information accuracy, technological dependence, and academic integrity. These findings highlight the need for artificial intelligence usage policies integrated into the public administration education curriculum.

References

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62.
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901.
dalam proses belajar mengajar: Studi kasus di universitas Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(1), 45-62.
Hadi, M. U., Al Tashi, Q., Qureshi, R., Shah, A., Muneer, A., Irfan, M., & Alasmari, A. (2023). Large language models: A comprehensive survey of its applications, challenges, limitations, and future prospects. TechRxiv.
Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends, research issues and applications of and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Artificial intelligence in language education. Educational Technology and Society, 26(1), 112-131.
Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451.
Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Suriya, S., Kaewprapa, W., & Pongsakornrungsilp, P. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital marketing: A literature review. International Journal of Information Technology and Language Studies, 7(1), 18-28.
Malik, A. R., Pratama, A. F., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan dalam proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia, 3(5), 201-215.
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2).
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342-363.
Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decision. Prentice-Hall.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Susanti, D., & Kurniawan, A. (2022). Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan administrasi negara: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 87-103.
Wibowo, T., Rahayu, S., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Penggunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan oleh mahasiswa
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27.
Published
2026-08-03
Section
Article