Analisis Pengaruh Program Eco-Campus Terhadap Perilaku Pro Lingkungan Mahasiswa

Analysis of the Influence of the Eco Campus Program on Student Pro-Environmental Behavior

  • Dyah Ekawati Noor Fitri Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i2.4863
Keywords: Eco-Campus, Mahasiswa, Perilaku Pro-Lingkungan

Abstract

Kerusakan lingkungan berdampak pada perubahan iklim, bencana, dan gangguan kesehatan. Kerusakan lingkungan ekstrim terjadi akibat peningkatan ekonomi, perubahan gaya hidup, konsumsi, dan perilaku manusia. Mahasiswa merupakan tonggak estafet dalam memberikan solusi yang tepat dalam mengelola dan memperbaiki lingkungan. Eco Campus merupakan program pembiasaan Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB) berbasis civitas akademik di Kota Surabaya sejak tahun 2015. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat PEB mahasiswa dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Sampel berasal dari fakultas Seni dan Bahasa, Sains, dan Pendidikan yang dipilih dengan metode cluster random sampling sebanyak 415 mahasiswa. Self-reported questionnaire terdiri atas 11 bagian yang diisi secara langsung di dalam kelas. Hasil studi menunjukkan tingkat PEB berada pada level sedang. Latar belakang pendidikan dan program Eco Campus tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap PEB. Analisis SEM menunjukkan variabel informasi, fear, perceived severity, perceived vulnerability, dan motivasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap PEB. Motivasi juga berperan sebagai mediator dalam meningkatkan PEB. Informasi mengenai keparahan dan kerentanan ancaman kerusakan lingkungan harus ditingkatkan dalam program Eco Campus untuk meningkatkan PEB mahasiswa.

References

  1. Aghdasi, M., Najafabadi, M. O., Mirdamadi, S. M., & Hoseini, S. J. F. (2022). Expanding Protection Motivation Theory: Investigating Farmers’ Pro-Environmental Behavior and Their Impact on a Sustainable Alternative Livelihood under Drought. 24(2), 305–320.
  2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Statistik Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kota Surabaya 2018. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. https://surabayakota.bps.go.id/publication/2018/12/28/c70683ba5941edc9771e2544/statistik-kesejahteraan-rakyat-kota-surabaya-2018.html
  3. Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014). Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands. Global Environmental Change, 28, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010
  4. Borden, R. J. (1977). One More Look at Social and Environmental Psychology: Away from the Looking Glass and into the Future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(3), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300309
  5. Chen, M.-F. (2020). Moral extension of the protection motivation theory model to predict climate change mitigation behavioral intentions in Taiwan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13714–13725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07963-6
  6. Clarke, M., Ma, Z., Snyder, S. A., & Hennes, E. P. (2021). Understanding invasive plant management on family forestlands: An application of protection motivation theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 286, 112161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112161
  7. Díaz, M. F., Charry, A., Sellitti, S., Ruzzante, M., Enciso, K., & Burkart, S. (2020). Psychological Factors Influencing Pro-environmental Behavior in Developing Countries: Evidence From Colombian and Nicaraguan Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580730
  8. Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Research on Protection Motivation Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
  9. Geiger, S. M., Geiger, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2019). Environment-Specific vs. General Knowledge and Their Role in Pro-environmental Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00718
  10. Janmaimool, P. (2017). Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors. Sustainability, 9(7), 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071079
  11. Janna, N. M., & Herianto, H. (2021). Konsep Uji Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Dengan Menggunakan SPSS [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/v9j52
  12. Jeong, G. H., & Kim, H. K. (2020). Pro?environmental health behaviour and educational needs among pregnant women: A cross?sectional survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(7), 1638–1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14346
  13. Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004
  14. Krajhanzl, J. (2010). ENVIRONMENTAL AND PROENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR. School and Health, 21, 251–274.
  15. Lippke, S., & Plotnikoff, R. C. (2009). The protection motivation theory within the stages of the transtheoretical model—Stage-specific interplay of variables and prediction of exercise stage transitions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X399906
  16. Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9
  17. Mamady, K. (2016). Factors Influencing Attitude, Safety Behavior, and Knowledge regarding Household Waste Management in Guinea: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2016, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9305768
  18. Marquart, H. (2022). Informing about the invisible: Communicating en route air pollution and noise exposure to cyclists and pedestrians using focus groups. European Transport Research Review, 14(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00571-0
  19. May, A. R., & Nastiti, A. (2022). Pro-environmental Behaviours and Protection Motivation Theory: A Case of Two Universities in Bandung, Indonesia. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan, 28(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2022.28.1.4
  20. Milne, S., Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (2000). Prediction and Intervention in Health-Related Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Protection Motivation Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 106–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02308.x
  21. Müderrisoglu, H., & Altanlar, A. (2011). Attitudes and behaviors of undergraduate students toward environmental issues. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 8(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326205
  22. Niehoff, E. (2021). Energy Saving within Households: How the Antecedents of our Behaviour Influence Energy Consumption.
  23. Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why Are You Doing Things for the Environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES)1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(5), 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
  24. Rashid, N. R. N. A., & Mohammad, N. (2012). A Discussion of Underlying Theories Explaining the Spillover of Environmentally Friendly Behavior Phenomenon. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 1061–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.106
  25. Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
  26. Ruan, W., Kang, S., & Song, H. (2020). Applying protection motivation theory to understand international tourists’ behavioural intentions under the threat of air pollution: A case of Beijing, China. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(16), 2027–2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1743242
  27. Savari, M., & Gharechaee, H. (2020). Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121512
  28. Shafiei, A., & Maleksaeidi, H. (2020). Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908
  29. Staats, H. (2004). Pro-environmental Attitudes and Behavioral Change. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, 3, 127–135.
  30. Wang, Y., Liang, J., Yang, J., Ma, X., Li, X., Wu, J., Yang, G., Ren, G., & Feng, Y. (2019). Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 237, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070
  31. Widyawati. (2019). Derajat Kesehatan 40% Dipengaruhi Lingkungan. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/umum/20190221/3029520/derajat-kesehatan-40-dipengaruhi-lingkungan/
Published
2024-02-24
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 2: FEBRUARI 2024 - Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS)
Section
Article