Stigma Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Bekerja di Indonesia: Literature Review

Stigma of People with Disabilities in Working in Indonesia: Literature Review

  • Rosta Rosalina Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Ninik Setyowati Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i3.4669
Keywords: Stigma, Disabilitas, Bekerja, Penyandang Disabilitas

Abstract

Kebijakan yang mengatur kesempatan bekerja bagi penyandang disabilitas dalam dunia kerja menjadi peluang dan akses, sekaligus menjadi sumber kekuatan bagi kaum disabilitas untuk menjadikan dirinya sebagai individu yang mandiri dan berdaya yang mampu menjalankan keberfungsian sosialnya. Kebijakan tersebut semestinya menjamin orang yang hidup dengan disabilitas memperoleh hak yang sama memperoleh pekerjaan. Penelitian kualitatif dengan kajian pustaka dan data sekunder digunakan dalam mengkaji riset ini. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penerapan kebijakan pemerintah terkait hak disabilitas untuk bekerja belum dilaksanakan secara optimal dan sungguh-sungguh oleh berbagai perusahaan di Indonesia.

References

  1. Aji, A. L. D., & Haryani, T. N. (2017). Diversitas dalam Dunia Kerja: Peluang dan Tantangan bagi Disabilitas. Spirit Publik: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v12i2.16246
  2. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual Of The American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, Dc: American Psychological Association.
  3. Cameron, L., & Suarez, D. C. (2017). Disability in Indonesia: What can we learn from the data? Australia Indonesia Partnership for Economic Governance. Australia Indonesia Partnership for Economic Governance. Retrieved from Australia Indonesia Partnership for Economic Governance website: https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1107138/Disability-in-Indonesia.pdf
  4. Cornish, J. A. E., Gorgens, K. A., Monson, S. P., Olkin, R., Palombi, B. J., & Abels, A. V. (2008). Perspectives on ethical practice with people who - proquest. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(5), 488–497. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1037/a0013092
  5. Corrigan, P. W., & Penn, D. L. (2015). Lessons from social psychology on discrediting psychiatric stigma. Stigma and Health, 1(S), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/2376-6972.1.s.2
  6. Gde Wiryawan, I. W. (2022). The corporate social responsibilty policy in the fulfillment of facilities for workers with disability. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(1), 340–349. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i1.1669
  7. Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2018). Cognitive Disability: Towards an Ethics of Possibility. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 36(1), 113–119. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26945993
  8. Gunawan, T., & Rezki, J. (2022). Pemetaan Pekerja dengan Disabilitas di Indonesia Saran dan Rekomendasi Kebijakan. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-jakarta/documents/publication/wcms_836030.pdf
  9. Mark, B. G., Hofmayer, S., Rauch, E., & Matt, D. T. (2019). Inclusion of Workers with Disabilities in Production 4.0: Legal Foundations in Europe and Potentials Through Worker Assistance Systems. Sustainability, 11(21), 5978. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215978
  10. Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and Disability: Constructing an Ethics of Care That Promotes Human Rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x
  11. Putri, A. (2019). Disabilitas dan Partisipasi di Pasar Tenaga Kerja Indonesia: Analisis Data Sakernas 2018. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 14(2).
  12. Reilly, N. P., Sirgy, M. J., & Gorman, G. A. (Eds.). (2016). WORK AND QUALITY OF LIFE : ethical practices in organizations. Springer.
  13. Siregar, A. A., Moeis, F. R., & Anky, W. A. K. (2021). Assessing Indonesia’s Inclusive Employment Opportunities for People with Disability in the COVID. LPEM-FEB UI Working Paper 063.
  14. Ståhl, C., MacEachen, E., & Lippel, K. (2014). Ethical Perspectives in Work Disability Prevention and Return to Work: Toward a Common Vocabulary for Analyzing Stakeholders’ Actions and Interactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(2), 237–250. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/42921334
  15. Syafi’ie, M. (2014). Pemenuhan Aksesibilitas Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. INKLUSI, 1(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.010208
  16. Tan, W. (2021). Kondisi Tenaga Kerja Penyandang Disabilitas : Tantangan dalam Mewujudkan Sustainable Development Goals. Rechtidee, 16(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v16i1.8896
  17. Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7(10), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0066338
Published
2024-03-13
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 3: MARET 2024 - Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains (JKS)
Section
Article