LEGALITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S ACCUSATIONS REGARDING THE VERDICT OF CRIME OF CORRUPTION IN THE PALU STATE COURT

  • Moh. Sabrang Law Office Moh. Sabrang and Fatners ToliToli
  • Syamsul Haling Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu
  • Samsuria Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu
Keywords: Corruption Crime, Public Prosecutor, Indictment, Acquittal

Abstract

The formulation of the general prosecutor's indictment for the criminal act of corruption against fishing boats in Tolitoli Regency did not meet the formal requirements and material requirements which required careful, clear and complete details about the qualifications of the perpetrators (plegen, doen plegen, uitlokker) and the actions committed by the suspects (act) so that the prosecutor's charges become obscure (abscurs libels). Analysis of the texts proves that there is no correlation between the text, the meaning of the text and the context which qualifies the criminal acts alleged by the public prosecutor against the alleged perpetrators of corruption. In order to prevent formal cancellation of the indictment by the court, the public prosecutor in preparing the indictment must include a clear, accurate and complete description of the actions committed and not related to each other, incomplete and partial, especially material requirements so that the description of the public prosecutor is vague/obscure (obscuur libel) so that the charges are null and void and the court's decision is acquitted.

References

A. BOOKS
Anton Suyitno, Kepastian Hukum dalam penyelesaian Kredit Macet, melalui eksekusi jaminan hak tanggungan tanpa proses gugatan pengadilan, (Kencana, 2018).
Defi Muslimah, Fungsi Koordinasi KPK dan Kejaksaan Agung Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (PT.Nasya Expanding Management, Tahun 2021).
Duwi Handoko, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Penitensier di Indonesia, (Hawa dan Ahwa, 2017).
Dahlan, Problematika keadilan dalam penerapan pidana terhadap penyalagunaan Narkotika, (CV. Budi Utama, 2017)
Djulaeka, Devi Rahayu, Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum, (Scopindo Media Pustaka, 2019).
Gatot Supramono, Teknik Membuat Keberatan Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, (Kecana, 2021).
Gregory Leyh. Hermeneutika Hukum (Nusa Media 2019).
Heniy Astiyanto, Buku Strategi Konsultasi Hukum, (Medpres digital, 2019)
Hulman Panjaitan, Kemahiran Beracara Pidana, (PT. Rajagrafindo Persada, 2020).
Irsan Arief, Pertimbangan Yuridis putusan bebas & Upaya Hukum Kasasi Perkara Pidana, (Mekar Cipta, 2021).
Imade Pasek Diantha, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, (PT. Fajar Interprama Mandiri 2017).
Irmawaty dkk, Buku Panduan penulisan Tesis, Program Study Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu(.2022).
Hasanal Mulkan, Hukum Tindak Pidana Khusus, (Kenacana, 2022).
Jonaedi Efendi, Jhony Ibrahim, Metode Pelitian Hukum Normatif dan empiris, (Prenamedia Group, 2018).
Muhammad Ainul Syamsu, Penjatuhan Pidana dan Dua Prinsip Dasar Hukum Pidana, (PT. Kharima Putra Utama, 2019).
M. Irsan Arief, Memahami Kesalahan Penyusnan Surat Dakwaan, (Mekar Cipta Lestari, 2021)
Rahman Amin, Pengantar Hukum Indonesia, (Penerbit Depublish, 2019).
Veri Junaidi dkk, Membaca 16 Tahun Mahkamah Konsitusi, data uji materi undang-undang terhadap uud 1945 (2003-2019), (Yayasan Konsitusi Demokrasi Inisiatif, 2019).
B. Journal
Fransisco Jero Runturambi, (2015), Penjatuhan Pidana Berdsarkan Dua Alat Buktu, dan Keyakinan Hakim, Jurnal Hukum Lex Crimen, Vol.4, (No. 4).
Freddy simanjuntak, (2020), Penerapan Surat dakwaan jaksa penunutut umum berdasarkan hukum positif di indonesia, Doktrina : Journal Of Law. Hisar Sitohang, dkk, (2018), Analisis Hukum Terhadap Tindak pidana Korupsi dengan penyalahgunaan Jabatan dalam bentuk penyuapan aktif ( studi putusan Nomor 195/Pid.Sus/TPK/2017/PN.SBY, Jurnal Hukum, Vol 07, (No.02).
I Ketut Arjawan, J, (2013), Metode peneltian Hukum Normatif, Jurnal Fakultas Hukum UNIPAS, Vol. 1. (No.1).
Jayadi Sirun, (2022), Relevansi Rezim alat bukti yang sah terhadap paradigma, Konsep dan perinsip pembentukan alat bukti, Jurnal Imiah Cahaya Hukum Program Pascasarjana UNMA Banten, Vol.2 (No.1).
Suhaimi, (2018.), Jurnal Yustitia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Madura, Vol. 19, (No.2).
C. Decree
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI, Put.No.294/Pid.sus/2016/Pn. Jkt.Sel, (2016).
Surat Dakwaan Kejaksaan Negeri Tolitoli No. Reg. Perkara: PDS 03/T.Toli/Ft.2/11/2021 (Tanggal 29 November 2021).
Surat Tuntutan Kejaksaan Negeri Tolitoli, No.Reg.PERK: PDS-03/T.Toli/Ft.2/II/2021/P-42, (Tgl. 25 April 2022).
D. Putusan Pengadilan Tipikor Palu nomor 63/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Pal.
E. Web-Site
http://eprints.unisla.ac.id/166/4/ diakses pada tanggal 16 Juni 2023, jam 19:07
www.gogle.com, diakses tanggal 18 Juni 2023 pukul 10.30 Wita, Teori Kepastian Hukum Menurut Ahli.
https://www.bpkp.go.id/sulteng/konten/705/Tugas-Pokok-dan-Fungsi.bpkp diakses pada hari ahad tanggal 16/7/2023. Pukul 07.00 wita.
https://www.google.com/search?q=asas+legalitas di akses pada tagl 16/7/2023 pukul 9.33
Published
2023-09-19
How to Cite
Moh. Sabrang, Syamsul Haling, & Samsuria. (2023). LEGALITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S ACCUSATIONS REGARDING THE VERDICT OF CRIME OF CORRUPTION IN THE PALU STATE COURT. Indonesian Research Journal in Legal Studies, 2(2), 1-15. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unismuhpalu.ac.id/index.php/IRJILS/article/view/4129